Search Results for "directory rules"

555 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 555 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Ruling That Time Limit Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act is Directory. The provision requiring District Magistrate to pass possession order within 30 days (extendable to 60 days) is directory, as non-compliance does not invalidate proceedings or prejudice the borrower.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that the time limit under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Collector's Order Refusing to Dismiss Disqualification Petition for Non-Compliance of Rule 6 of Maharashtra Local Authority Members' Disqualification Rules, 1987. Verification of Petition and Documents Held Sufficient Compliance with Rule 6.

The petitioner, Fazalur Rehman Gulam Nabi, President of Municipal Council, Balapur, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Collector, Akola...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Rebate Claims for Exported Cables in Central Excise Case — Emphasizes Substantive Compliance Over Procedural Technicalities. Revisional Authority Must Consider Merits, Not Merely Endorse Lower Authorities' Findings Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002.

The petitioner, UM Cables Limited, is a manufacturer of Polyethylene Insulated Jelly filled Copper Cables and Optical Fiber Cables, falling under tari...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order Quashing No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch. Service of Notice on Adult Member of Family Under No Confidence Motion Rules, 1975, Held Sufficient Despite Meeting Rules Requirement of Service on Male Member.

The petitioners, members of Village Panchayat Futana, challenged an order of the Divisional Commissioner, Aurangabad, which had allowed an appeal by r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Student to Appear for Engineering Exams Despite Attendance Shortfall — Attendance Requirement Under Ordinance 0.2604 is Directory, Not Mandatory. The court held that the college has power to condone shortage of attendance and directed the college to consider the petitioner's case.

The petitioner, Sanchita Sunil Bhadani, a student of the Engineering Course in Information Technology at Ramrao Adik Institute of Technology (Responde...