Search Results for "dire necessity"

124 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 124 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Revision Petition Against Order for Educational Expenses Under DV Act. Daughter's Post-Graduation Fees Claim Under Section 20(d) of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

The matter arose from a criminal revision petition filed by the father against the order of the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Mangalore, con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC020009812016_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement for Sale Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Establish Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract.

The original plaintiff, Vijay Laxmipati Dasari (since deceased, represented by his legal heirs), filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Delay in Disposal of Representation. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detenu's Fundamental Right Under Article 22(5) Was Violated Due to Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation.

The petitioner, mother of the detenu Manoj Sansare, challenged the detention order dated 22nd September 2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Bri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated by Delayed Consideration.

The petitioner, Pullusingh @ Jaysingh Kalusingh Junni, challenged a preventive detention order dated 29th March 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Pol...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Parking Space Regulations Under UDCPR in Navi Mumbai. Court holds that UDCPR provisions are statutory and binding, and that the petitioner failed to demonstrate any illegality or public interest violation.

The petitioner, Sandeep Thakur, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging the parking space regulations under the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Releasing Land from Acquisition in Pimpri Chinchwad Development Case. Minister Exceeded Powers Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 by Not Recording Reasons and Ignoring Public Interest.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Pimpri Chinchwad New Town Development Authority challenging an order dated 21st September 2004 passe...