Search Results for "developer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "developer"

1021 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1021 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Second Appeal in RERA Registration Dispute — Development Agreement Not Required to Be Registered Under Registration Act for Project Registration. The Court held that the Goa Real Estate Regulatory Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by insisting on compulsory registration of a development agreement under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908, as a precondition for processing a project registration application under Sections 3 and 4 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

18 Jul 2026

The appellant, Edcon Real Estate Developers, a registered partnership firm, filed a Second Appeal under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Regularisation of Irregular Allotment of Land for Commercial Complex in Navi Mumbai, Imposing Restitution of Rs. 100 Crore. The Court held that where irreversible economic and social consequences have crystallised over two decades, public interest may be better served by regularisation with full financial restitution rather than demolition.

1 Jan 2026

The case pertains to a challenge against the allotment of land by CIDCO to K. Raheja Corp. Private Limited (the Developer) for the construction of a s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging AGRC Order — Restores Termination of Developer for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Consents and No-Objection Certificate. Failure to Obtain Consent of 70% Municipal Tenants and Annexure-II from MCGM Justifies Termination Under Section 13(2) of Maharashtra Slums Areas Act, 1971.

10 Jun 2024

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition challenging the order of the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) which had set aside the terminati...

High Court

Legal Dispute Over Termination of Developer's Appointment for SRS Implementation in Mumbai. Unraveling the Complexities of Land Allocation and Timely Implementation in Slum Rehabilitation Schemes in Maharashtra

10 May 2024

Legal dispute regarding the termination of a developer's appointment for implementing a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme (SRS) in Mumbai under the Maharasht...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SRA Termination of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Developer Failed to Complete Project Within Stipulated Time and Did Not Comply with Development Agreement and SRA Conditions.

12 Apr 2024

The Petitioner, Shailesh Mulchand Savla, sole proprietor of M/s. Kunal Builders & Developers, filed a Writ Petition challenging the termination of his...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Developer Selection in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme - Tenants of Municipal Corporation Held Ineligible to Vote. The court upheld the selection of developer by General Body Meeting, finding no procedural irregularity in service of notice or conduct of meeting.

25 Jan 2024

The petitioners, claiming to be eligible slum dwellers, challenged the appointment of Respondent No.7 as developer for a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme on...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Developer Appointment in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Petitioner's failure to obtain 70% slum dweller consent and submit documents within stipulated time justified termination under Section 13(2) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

9 Jan 2024

The petitioner, Surjit Singh Arora, sole proprietor of M/s. Sukhamani Construction, was appointed as developer for a slum rehabilitation scheme under ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Land Owner's Appeal in Consumer Case, Holding No Joint Liability for Developer's Default. Collaboration Agreement and Tripartite Agreement Did Not Impose Obligation on Land Owner to Flat Buyers Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

7 Dec 2021

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) allowing a complaint by flat buyers against a ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Housing Board's Appeal in Consumer Dispute — Liability for Mental Harassment and Litigation Costs Apportioned 70:30 Between Developer and Housing Board; Interest Rate Reduced to 9% p.a. The Court held that Clause 9(c) of the Tripartite Agreement does not cover mental harassment or litigation costs, and the interest rate should remain at 9% p.a. as per the agreement and earlier orders.

17 Dec 2019

The appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by Respondent No. 2 (a flat buyer) against M/s. Parasvanath Developers Pvt. Ltd. (Developer) and Cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Appointment of Court Receiver and Directions for Possession in Redevelopment Dispute — Non-Consenting Members Directed to Vacate to Facilitate Redevelopment. Court held that overwhelming majority of society members having consented, non-consenting members cannot obstruct redevelopment and must hand over possession through Court Receiver.

3 Oct 2013

The appeals arose from a judgment of the Learned Single Judge dated 16 September 2013 in a motion taken out by the first respondent (developer) in a s...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)