Search Results for "detenue statement"

137 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 137 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Furnishing of Vital Documents. Failure to provide injury certificates of all injured persons in a solitary incident vitiates subjective satisfaction of detaining authority.

The petitioner, Monty Bahadur Karotiya, challenged his detention order dated 02.02.2022 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane City under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Improper Verification of In-Camera Statements. Failure to Record Subjective Satisfaction on Truthfulness of Secret Witnesses Renders Detention Invalid Under Section 3 of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Pravin Ganpat Kakad, challenged an order of detention dated 21.08.2020 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nashik City under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's Past Conduct and Single Incident Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Chandrakala w/o Ramlal Jadhav, challenged the detention order dated 07.12.2020 passed by the District Collector, Jalna (respondent No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated by Failure to Furnish Statements of Co-Accused.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Mushtaq Abubakar Sayed, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the detent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unreasonable Delay. Court holds that reliance on fabricated offences and lack of live link between alleged activities and detention order vitiates preventive detention.

The petitioner, Anil s/o Ramesh Manglani, challenged a detention order dated 21.09.2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur City under Sectio...