Search Results for "delayed refund"

256 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 256 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Summary Judgment in Recovery Suit Against DDA for Refund of Sale Consideration After Land Acquisition Lapses. The Court held that DDA cannot retain the money after failing to convey title due to lapsing of acquisition, and the suit was within limitation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the Delhi High Court's order dismissing the appellant's application for summary judgment under Order XIII...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Consumer's Appeal in Real Estate Dispute, Setting Aside NCDRC Order and Granting Refund with Interest. The court upheld the consumer's right to terminate the agreement due to delay in possession and directed refund as per contractual terms under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the appellants before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) regarding delay...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Consumer Complaint Against Builder for Refund of Consideration Due to Premature Filing and Lack of Deficiency Proof. Complaint Filed Before Expiry of Contractual Grace Period Under Allotment Terms, and Appellants Failed to Establish Incomplete Work or Delay in Possession Offer.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by the appellants against the respondent-company, a builder, alleging deficiency in service due to d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Television Production Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Reputation. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that claimant failed to prove loss of reputation due to alleged breach of contract.

The petitioners, Star India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Customs to Refund Sale Proceeds with Interest Following Settlement Commission Order. Failure to Implement Settlement Order Within Reasonable Time Amounts to Unjust Enrichment and Arbitrary Action Under Article 226.

The Petitioner, Vishnu M. Harlalka, approached the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking implementation of an order dated 9 ...