Search Results for "defective machinery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "defective machinery"

185 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 185 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Challenge to Tribunal Order Refusing to Treat Company's Closure Application as Withdrawn. Held that the Tribunal's refusal was not perverse and the Union's application was premature under Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

9 Jan 2024

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by the General Motors Employees Union challenging an order of the Industrial Tribunal dated 28.04.2023 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Workman for Violence and Abusive Language in Industrial Dispute. Labour Court's finding of fair enquiry for first charge-sheet and just punishment for second charge-sheet upheld, with modification of punishment for defective enquiry.

23 Dec 2005

The Petitioner, Hanumant Pandurang Indalkar, was employed as a Millwright Mechanic with Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. (the Company) and was...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Company in Consumer Protection Case, Holding Purchase of Software for Business Expansion is Commercial Purpose. Company Not a 'Consumer' Under Section 2(1)(d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as Goods Used for Profit Generation.

13 Nov 2025

The appellant, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, filed a consumer complaint before the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Del...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Suo Motu Public Interest Litigation on Road Safety, Emphasizing Mandatory Duties of Municipal Corporations. Expansive Definition of 'Public Street' and Obligation to Ensure Safe Passage Under Sections 61(m), (n), (o) of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, Reaffirmed.

12 Apr 2018

This judgment in suo motu Public Interest Litigation No. 71 of 2013 arose from the Bombay High Court's concern about the deplorable condition of roads...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Appeals by Bank in Securitisation Act Case Regarding Maintainability of Civil Suits — The Court Examines Whether Plaints Against Bank Are Barred Under Section 34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.

26 Oct 2018

The litigation arose from a batch of five civil suits filed by several plaintiffs against M/s. Orbit Corporation Ltd. and Axis Bank Limited, concernin...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Licence Fee Validity Under Factories Act, 1948; Levy Is Fee, Not Tax, Due to Services Rendered by Inspectors. Inspection Services and Spending of 60% of Fee Revenue Establish Quid Pro Quo Justifying Annual Renewal Fee for Factories Under Delhi Factories Rules, 1950.

11 Sep 1969

The Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd., which operated several factories in Delhi, was required under the Factories Act, 1948 and the Delhi Factor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Customs Drawback Classification Dispute — Stainless Steel Bright Bars of Austenitic Variety Classifiable as Bright Steel Bars Under Sub-Serial No. 3606. The Court held that the product description 'Bright Steel Bars' in the drawback schedule includes stainless steel bright bars, and the Department's reclassification under sub-serial No. 3803 was erroneous.

13 Oct 2017

The Petitioners, India Steel Industries and its partner H.B. Gupta, are manufacturers of stainless steel articles conforming to grade AISI 304 of Aust...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Reference of Industrial Dispute for Adjudication — Reference Need Not Contain Detailed Facts, Only Dispute Must Be Identifiable. The Court held that an order of reference under Section 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is valid even if it does not contain the nature of dispute or facts and circumstances, as long as the dispute is identifiable from the reference.

21 Dec 2006

The petitioner, M/s. Lokmat Newspapers Pvt. Ltd., challenged the order dated 3/4/2006 passed by the Industrial Court/Tribunal, Nagpur in Reference No....

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Order Allowing Amendment of Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case — Amendment After Cognizance and Process Held Not Permissible Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

28 Apr 2023

The case involves a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed by the applicants (accused) challenging an o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Contractor's Appeal in Arbitration Dispute Over Time-Barred Claims and Legal Misconduct — Award Set Aside by Lower Courts Restored. The Court held that the arbitrator had jurisdiction to decide limitation and contractual issues, and the award was not vitiated by legal misconduct under the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940.

22 Aug 2023

The case involves a dispute arising from a road construction contract awarded in 1983 by the Government of Maharashtra Irrigation Department to M/s S....

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)