Search Results for "dealer protection"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "dealer protection"

203 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 203 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Registration of 'DROPOVIT' Trade Mark in Vitamin Preparation Dispute; Holds No Deceptive Similarity with 'PROTOVIT'. Terminal Syllable 'VIT' Held Common to Trade and Descriptive, and Pharmaceutical Products Sold on Prescription Reduce Likelihood of Confusion under Sections 12(1) and 9(1) of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

8 Sep 1969

The dispute involved a trade mark rectification proceeding under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958, between F. Hoffmann-La Roche & Co. Ltd., a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Rejection of Candidature for Retail Outlet Dealership Due to Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's Candidature Was Rejected on Grounds Not Mentioned in the Advertisement or Brochure, and Without Providing an Opportunity to Explain.

24 Mar 2021

The petitioner, Nikhil Dilipsing Rajput, applied for a retail outlet dealership pursuant to an advertisement dated 25.11.2018 issued by the Indian Oil...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over Pharmaceutical Marks OROFER and OROFER-XT vs COROFER and COROFER-XT. Court finds deceptive similarity and rejects acquiescence defense under Section 33 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

10 Sep 2014

The Plaintiff, Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Corona Remedies Pvt. Ltd., alleging that t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Interim Relief Granted for Alleged Deceptive Similarity Between 'DEXORANGE' and 'LUPINEXORANGE'. The court held that the marks were visually and phonetically distinct, and the appellant failed to establish a prima facie case for interim injunction.

10 Feb 2017

The appellant, Franco-Indian Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., filed an appeal against an order of the learned Single Judge refusing to grant interim relief ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Rejection of Discharge in MPID Act Case – Alleged Fraudulent Hosiery Scheme – No Discharge as Prima Facie Case Exists

2 May 2025

The appellant, Smt. Neelam Rajendra Nanaware, filed a criminal appeal under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Fin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Trademark Infringement Suit for ANTITHYROX and THYROX Against Defendant's LETHYROX. No deceptive similarity found as prefix 'LE' distinguishes marks and THYROX is descriptive of thyroid treatment.

29 May 2013

The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a suit against Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and another for infringement of their registered trad...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Against Diamond Bourse Suspension — Private Association's Internal Decisions Not Subject to Judicial Review. The court held that the Bharat Diamond Bourse, as a private company, had the right to regulate its membership and premises, and its actions were not amenable to writ jurisdiction or public law remedies.

16 Aug 2016

The plaintiffs, VSM Diamonds Pvt Ltd and three individuals, filed a suit against Bharat Diamond Bourse (BDB), a company incorporated under Section 25 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Disposes Pending Applications and Show Cause Notices in Scheme of Compromise Under Section 391 of Companies Act, 1956. Criminal Proceedings Under Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999 Allowed to Continue Notwithstanding Sanction of Scheme.

7 Jan 2010

The matter arose from a scheme of compromise and arrangement proposed by Europlast India Ltd. under Section 391 of the Companies Act, 1956. The unsecu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaint Against Marketer in Weights and Measures Case — Manufacturer Already Convicted and Fined for Non-Declaration of Retail Sale Price Under Packaged Commodities Rules, 1977.

5 Dec 2006

The applicants, Colgate Palmolive India Ltd. and others, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Aglowmed Limited v. Aglow Pharmaceuticals Private Limited. Plaintiff's registered trademark 'AGLOWMED' held infringed by defendant's use of 'AGLOW' for pharmaceutical products, and defendant restrained from using deceptively similar name.

30 Jul 2019

The plaintiff, Aglowmed Limited, filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction restraining the defendant, Aglow Pharmaceuticals Private Limited, from us...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)