Search Results for "dealer exception"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "dealer exception"

173 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 173 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Exemption for HDPE Cloth as Man-Made Fabric in Sales Tax Reference. HDPE cloth manufactured from HDPE yarn using looms is exempt from sales tax under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, as it falls within the description of 'cloth' in the First Schedule to the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1958.

5 Jun 2017

The case involves a sales tax reference under Section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, made by the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal at the insta...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Sales Tax Classification Dispute — Maize Starch Held Exempt as Product of Millets Under Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. Exemption Notification Prevails Over General Taxation Entry for 'Starch of Any Kind'.

4 Jul 2023

The appellant, Santhosh Maize & Industries Limited, a dealer in maize starch since 1975, was registered under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 19...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Allows Builder's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Forfeiture of Earnest Money — Reduces Forfeiture from 20% to 10% of Basic Sale Price. Court upholds NCDRC's power to strike down unconscionable contractual terms but modifies interest rate and forfeiture percentage based on facts.

10 Feb 2025

The present appeal arises from a consumer complaint filed by the respondents (buyers) against the appellant (builder, Godrej Projects Development Limi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Revenue's Appeal in MVAT Penalty Case — Section 61(2) Does Not Permit Reduction of Penalty Below Statutory Rate. The court held that once a penalty is imposed under Section 61(2) of the MVAT Act, the quantum must be exactly one tenth per cent of total sales, with no discretion to reduce.

15 Sep 2011

The Revenue appealed against a decision of the Maharashtra Sales Tax Tribunal reducing a penalty imposed under Section 61(2) of the Maharashtra Value ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.

24 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Modvat Credit in Central Excise Case Due to Lockout Causing Delay in Receipt of Goods. Notification dated 30.3.1994 restricting credit after 30.6.1994 for gate passes issued before 1.4.1994 held inapplicable where delay was due to lockout, a force majeure event.

21 Sep 2010

The petitioners, N R C Limited and Mr. Ashokan A., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a Notification dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Authority Order in Fair Price Shop Resignation Dispute — Minister's Revision Allowed Without Notice to Petitioner Violates Natural Justice. Resignation from dealership cannot be accepted without formal acceptance by competent authority under the Maharashtra Essential Commodities (Public Distribution System) Order, 2005.

8 Aug 2011

The petitioner, Mangu s/o Basu Rathod, was a fair price shop owner and held a licence for retail sale of kerosene at village Manjerjawla. He claimed t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions in Granite Dealer's VAT Assessment Case — Upholds Tribunal's Order Confirming Best Judgment Assessment. The court held that the Assessing Officer was justified in rejecting the books of accounts and making a best judgment assessment under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, as the dealer failed to produce purchase bills and other relevant documents.

11 Feb 2022

The petitioner, M/s Raj Shree Granites Limited, a dealer in granite, filed four revision petitions under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Ta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Bunker Fuel Sales to Vessels on High Seas Are Taxable Under Maharashtra VAT Act. Petitioners Challenged Assessment Orders and Recovery Notices Claiming Sales Occurred Outside State Territory and Were in Course of Export.

19 Oct 2015

The dispute arose from assessment and recovery proceedings under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 concerning sales of High Speed Diesel (HSD)...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused in Cheating and Misappropriation Case – Complaint Found Malicious and Not Disclosing Essential Ingredients of Offences. The court ruled that where a dispute over security cheques stemmed from a commercial transaction and no individual role was attributed to the directors, no prima facie case under Sections 403 and 420 IPC existed, and prosecution was an abuse of process (Paras 11-13).

11 Feb 2005

The dispute arose from a commercial relationship between a cement manufacturer and its dealer. The dealer, a proprietary concern, had been purchasing ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)