Search Results for "cosmetics"

171 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 171 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes License Suspension in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Case — Procedural Violation in Inspection and Appeal. Failure to Provide Inspection Report and Opportunity of Hearing Renders Suspension Order Unsustainable Under Rule 66(2) of Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945.

The petitioner, M/s. Raj Pharma, a partnership firm holding a valid drug license under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 and Rules, 1945, challenged t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash FIR in Sushant Singh Rajput Death Case — Allegations of Abetment to Suicide and Drug Nexus Require Investigation. Court holds that FIR prima facie discloses cognizable offences under IPC and NDPS Act, and quashing at threshold is not warranted.

The petitioners, sisters of the deceased actor Sushant Singh Rajput, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Blacklisting of Drug Manufacturer for Supplying Sub-Standard Cream Due to Reliance on Erroneous Test Report. Appellate Lab Report Under Section 25(4) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 Held Conclusive, Ignoring It Renders Decision Perverse.

The appellant, Medipol Pharmaceutical India Pvt. Ltd., supplied Clotrimazole Cream 1% 15 gm tubes to the respondent, Post Graduate Institute of Medica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Drug Manufacturer for Lack of Sanction Under Section 32 of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940. Prosecution for Alleged Violation of Sections 18(a)(i) and 17B(d) Held Invalid Without Prior Sanction.

The petitioners, including a pharmaceutical company and its directors/employees, challenged the criminal proceedings initiated against them in Spl.CC....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Recognition of L.C.E.H. Qualification for Allopathic Practice. L.C.E.H. is a Homoeopathy Qualification and Does Not Entitle Holders to Practice Modern Scientific System of Medicine.

The petitioners, LCEH Doctors' Association and two individual doctors holding L.C.E.H. (Licentiate of Court of Examiners in Homoeopathy) qualification...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Test Reports Under Drugs and Cosmetics Act in NDPS Prosecution. Section 25(2) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 applies only to samples collected by Inspector under that Act, not to samples collected under NDPS Act, 1985.

The petitioner, M/s. Kamud Drugs Pvt. Ltd., filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to respondent No.2, the Ce...