Search Results for "controlling interest"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "controlling interest"

546 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 546 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Terminated Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Requires Loss of Property or Moral Turpitude, Not Mere Misconduct.

7 Jul 2026

The petitioner, The Jalgaon District Central Co-operative Bank Limited, challenged an order dated 09.10.2024 passed by the Appellate Authority/Industr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Termination of Employees by Trust in Landmark Judgment on Maintainability of Writ Petitions Against Private Trusts. Court holds that a private trust not performing public functions is not a 'State' under Article 12 and thus not amenable to writ jurisdiction.

17 Oct 2025

The judgment involves four writ petitions filed by employees of Dr. J. J. Magdum Trust, a private trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Ex-Promoters' Gratuity Claims, Holds Directors in Control Not 'Employees' Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Founders who were in absolute control of company affairs cannot claim gratuity as employees despite drawing salary, as they fall outside the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, were the founders and directors of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. They claimed gratuity for ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Gratuity Dispute — Sets Aside Industrial Court Order Denying Gratuity. Employee's Continuous Service of 30 Years Entitles Him to Gratuity Under Section 4 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Despite Employer's Claim of Abandonment.

1 Sep 2023

The Petitioner, Noor Mohammed Abdul Rehman Mulla, a retired employee, challenged the judgment and order dated 26 March 2021 passed by the Industrial C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Revenue Authorities in Stamp Duty Undervaluation Cases — Revisional Powers Under Section 47A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Upheld. The Court held that the limitation period for suo motu revision by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority is five years from the date of the order, not from the date of registration.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court of India heard a batch of civil appeals arising from orders of the Madras High Court concerning the interpretation of Section 47A of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows MCGM's Writ Petition Against Gratuity Order Due to Procedural Irregularities. Controlling Authority's Ex Parte Order Set Aside as Corporation Was Not Given Proper Opportunity to Be Heard.

6 Aug 2018

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM) filed a writ petition challenging three orders: (1) an ex parte order of the controlling authority ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Controlling Authority's Orders Deferring Gratuity Payment Due to Pending Criminal Proceedings. Statutory Right to Gratuity Under Section 4 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Cannot Be Withheld Pending Criminal Case.

17 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Shri B. Premananda Pai, a former Senior Manager of Vijaya Bank, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Claim with Weekly Holidays Counted as Worked Days and Interest for Delayed Payment under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Employee entitled to inclusion of weekly holidays for 240-day eligibility, additional gratuity on retrospective pay revision, and interest at 10% per annum from date of superannuation.

11 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Baban S/o Rama Khakale, a retired employee of the Maharashtra State Farming Corporation Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the ju...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Gratuity Petition with Weekly Holidays Counted as Worked Days and Interest at 10%. Employee entitled to additional gratuity based on retrospective pay revision and interest for delayed payment under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

11 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Baban S/o Rama Khakale, a retired employee of Maharashtra State Farming Corporation Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the judgme...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Gratuity Award for Workman in Continuous Service Dispute. Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 — Employer failed to prove break in service despite alleged termination during 1982 strike; workman deemed in continuous service for 30 years.

11 Oct 2010

The Petitioner, M/s. Phoenix Mills Limited, challenged the Judgment and Order dated 23rd March 2004 passed by the Controlling Authority under the Paym...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)