Search Results for "contractor employee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "contractor employee"

497 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 497 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Zilla Panchayat's Challenge to Gratuity Orders — Workmen Engaged Through Contractor Held Entitled to Gratuity from Principal Employer Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The court held that the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(e) includes persons employed through a contractor, and the principal employer is liable for gratuity when the contractor fails to pay.

12 May 2022

The case involves six writ petitions filed by the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Panchayat, Mysuru, and other officers challenging orders of the Ass...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows BEML's Appeal in Canteen Workers' Regularisation Dispute — Contract Labour Not Absorbed Despite Canteen Being Statutory Obligation. The court held that the workmen in a statutory canteen run by a contractor are not entitled to regularisation as employees of the principal employer under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970.

12 Mar 2015

The case involves two appeals arising from a common order dated 16.04.2010 in Writ Petition No. 35453/2003. The appellant in WA No. 1980/2010 is BEML ...

High Court

High Court Upholds Award Directing Absorption of Contract Workers as Permanent Employees. Tribunal's Finding of Sham Contract Upheld as Workers Were Directly Supervised and Paid by Principal Employer Under CLRA Act, 1970.

17 Feb 2016

The Airports Authority of India (AAI), a statutory body, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the Award dated 26 Ma...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Appeal by Municipal Council in Workmen's Compensation Case — Construction of Shopping Complex Held Part of Principal Employer's Business Under Section 2(2) of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. Municipal Council Liable Jointly and Severally with Contractor for Compensation to Injured Workman.

23 Jan 2014

The case arises from a claim for compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, filed by Manoj Achyut Bhosle (respondent No.1), a labourer e...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Driver with 50% Backwages in Industrial Dispute Against Hotel. Principal Employer Liability Affirmed Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for Termination by Contractor.

30 Jan 2024

The judgment concerns cross petitions filed by M/s. Chalet Hotels Ltd. (the employer) and Mr. Bhikan Laxman Deokar (the workman) challenging an Award ...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Workmen's Appeal in Contract Labour Wage Claim — No Employer-Employee Relationship Established Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Workmen failed to prove direct employment with principal employer, and closure compensation already paid by contractor.

28 Apr 2026

The appellants, a group of workmen, filed a writ appeal against the order of a single judge in WP No. 25872 of 2018 dated 03.08.2023. The workmen were...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Trade Union's Writ Petition Seeking Prohibition of Contract Labour and Regularization of Workers at Temple. The Court held that disputed questions of fact regarding employer-employee relationship cannot be adjudicated in writ jurisdiction and that the appropriate remedy lies under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

8 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Rashtriya Shramik Aghadi, a registered trade union, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a writ of prohibition t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Principal Employers in Workmen's Compensation Case, Holding That Contractor's Employee Not a 'Workman' Under the Act. The court set aside the Commissioner's award of compensation and penalty, finding that the deceased was employed by a contractor and not by the appellants.

9 Mar 2023

The appeal was filed by Gowardhan Madanlal Agrawal and Shantabai Gowardhandas Agrawal, owners of a shop complex and residential flats at Jaisthambha C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Workmen Seeking Absorption in Western Coalfields Limited — Canteen Workers Not Entitled to Direct Absorption as Contractor Was Not a Sham and Contract Labour Was Not Prohibited Under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1947.

5 Jan 2011

The petitioner, a trade union representing workmen of Taroda Opencast Mine of Western Coalfields Limited, challenged an award of the Central Governmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Tribunal Award Reinstating Contract Workers as Regular Employees of Gulf Air Company. Contract Labour System Found to be a Sham Designed to Avoid Liability Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

11 Dec 2017

The case involves two writ petitions arising from an award of the Industrial Tribunal dated 23rd May 2006 in Reference CGIT 20 of 2001. The Central Go...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)