Search Results for "contiguous owner"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "contiguous owner"

39 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 39 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Notifications invoking urgency under Section 17(4) and dispensing with inquiry under Section 5A upheld as land was necessary for residential colony scheme and decision based on subjective satisfaction of authority.

23 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, initiated by the State of Uttar Pradesh and the Bulandshhar ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Vesting of Private Forest Land Under Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971. The court affirmed the tribunal's rejection of the claimant's exemption plea due to insufficient evidence of principal cultivation as plantation under Section 2(f) of the Act.

29 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a dispute over the vesting of land under the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971. The respondent, Popular ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Demolition Notices Issued by Nagpur Improvement Trust for Alleged Unauthorized Construction. Court holds that show cause notices under Section 53 of the Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 must be served on the owner or person in possession, and that the Trust cannot demolish without giving an opportunity of hearing.

19 Mar 2012

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by owners of flats in Nagpur challenging demolition notices issued by the Nagpur Improvement Trust (N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to High Power Committee Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute. Committee's decision to replace developer with new developer upheld as within its powers under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 and the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai, 1991.

29 Jan 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Sreepati Built Infras Investment Ltd., a developer, challenged the order dated 29/4/2017 passed by the High Power Committee (resp...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Santiniketan Construction Case - Appellants Wins Against Demolition Order - High Court&#039;s Direction for Demolition and Compensation Set Aside

29 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Appellants challenging the High Court's order directing demolition of their building in Santiniketan ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition for Interim Relief in Development Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Slum Rehabilitation Authority. Court holds that developer's unilateral action of obtaining SRA approval for redevelopment on petitioner's plot without consent does not warrant interim relief under Section 9 of Arbitration Act as the agreement contained arbitration clause and petitioner failed to show irreparable injury.

4 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Jai Neptune Co-operative Housing Society Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seek...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. The Court held that the appellant-defendant failed to prove exclusive title by adverse possession and that the suit was not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

6 Jan 2016

The dispute pertains to a suit for partition and separate possession of agricultural lands filed by the original plaintiff (respondent no.1) against t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Title and Adverse Possession. Court holds that plea of adverse possession must be specifically pleaded and proved, and that the First Appellate Court's reversal of trial court's finding on adverse inference was justified.

5 Aug 2014

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the appellants (original plaintiffs) against the judgment of the First Appellate Court which reversed the t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Suit for Recovery of Possession - Sets Aside Summary Judgment and Decree for Eviction. The Court held that the plaint did not disclose a valid cause of action as it was based on ambiguous lease expiry and future events, making summary judgment under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 improper.

22 Sep 2022

The appeal arose from a civil suit for recovery of possession of a plot of land in Delhi. The appellant, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., operate...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Modifies Compensation Rate in Land Dispute Under Compromise Decree — Guideline Value Under Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957 Fixed at Rs. 750 per Square Foot. Court Holds That Executing Court Erred in Applying Subsequent Notification and High Court's Reduction Was Unwarranted, Directs Payment of Average Guideline Value.

30 Apr 2026

The case involves a dispute between Appellants (N.I.C.E.) and the decree holders, Respondents, arising from a compromise decree in a suit for permanen...

1 2 3 4

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)