Search Results for "container terminal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "container terminal"

48 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 48 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summons for Judgment in Container Lease Dispute — Defendant Fails to Raise Triable Issues. Plaintiff entitled to decree for unpaid replacement value of lost containers under Equipment Agreement dated 30th December 2002.

23 Aug 2012

The Plaintiff, Florens Containers Inc., filed a summary suit against the Defendant, M/s. Ornate Multimodal Carriers Pvt. Ltd., for recovery of US$ 58,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case by Restoring Arbitral Award. High Court's Setting Aside of Award Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Found Erroneous as It Exceeded Scope of Judicial Review.

28 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard a civil appeal arising from a dispute between PSA Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd., the appellant, and The Board of Trustees...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Restrains Bank from Honoring Bank Guarantee Invocation After Completion of Contract — Invocation Held Invalid as Guarantee Ceased to Be Operative. The court held that the bank guarantee had ceased to be operative upon completion of the contract as certified by the Independent Engineer, and the beneficiary's invocation was not in terms of the guarantee.

12 Apr 2013

The plaintiff, M/s. ABG Kandla Container Terminal Ltd., filed a suit seeking declarations that a bank guarantee had ceased to be operative and that th...

High Court

SALES TAX REFERENCE NO. 52 OF 2009

8 Feb 2019

The matter came before the Bombay High Court as two sales tax references arising from the assessment of M/s. Radhasons International, a partnership fi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders in Red Sanders Smuggling Case — Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detention under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA set aside as detaining authority did not consider whether bail conditions or other measures would suffice.

28 Jun 2013

The Bombay High Court allowed two habeas corpus petitions challenging preventive detention orders dated 21 February 2013 issued under Section 3(1) of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case — Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 12% per annum. The court held that an interest rate of 18% pendente lite was excessive and modified it to 12% while maintaining post-award interest at 15% under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

12 Jul 2019

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Container Corporation of India Ltd. (CONCOR) agai...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 1723 OF 2020

18 Aug 2021

The dispute arose from a tender floated by respondent no.1 MIHAN India Ltd. for up-gradation, modernization, operation and management of Dr. Babasaheb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in BOT Contract Dispute — Reduces Interest Rate from 18% to 12%. Court holds that arbitrator's findings on breach and damages are not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Apr 2015

The petitioner, Agarsons Container Terminals, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit Challenging Invocation of Counter Guarantee in Port Development Project. Court holds that fraud must be established against the beneficiary, not a third party, and that invocation of a counter guarantee is not fraudulent merely because the underlying contract is disputed.

5 Oct 2012

The plaintiff, M/s. ABG Ports Limited, filed a suit seeking a declaration that the Joint Bidding Agreement (JBA), the Counter Guarantee, and its invoc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Unexplained Delay. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Inordinate and Unexplained Delay of 7 Months Between Arrest and Issuance of Detention Order Vitiated the Order Under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974.

9 Jul 2015

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mohammed Aboobaker, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a preventi...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)