Search Results for "consortium change"

190 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 190 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Petition Against GST Attachment of Secured Assets Under SARFAESI Act. Priority of Secured Creditor Over Crown Debts Upheld Under Section 26E of SARFAESI Act and Section 31B of RDDB Act.

The petitioner, Indian Overseas Bank, a secured creditor, had extended credit facilities to Respondent No. 3, Savair Energy Limited. Upon default, the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Applies Pranay Sethi Principles for Future Prospects and Multiplier. Deceased Agricultural Labourer's Dependents Granted Rs.6,84,000 with 6% Interest.

The appellants, being the wife, father, and two minor sons of the deceased Madhu Kondiba Gavali, filed a claim application under Section 166 of the Mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Parents of Deceased MBA Student, Enhances Compensation from Rs. 2 Lakh to Rs. 23.38 Lakh in Motor Accident Claim. Notional Income of Rs. 15,000 Per Month Adopted with 40% Future Prospects and Multiplier of 18.

The appellants, parents of the deceased Sujeet Singh, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Upholds Compensation of Rs.22,99,125/- for Death of Doctor. Negligence of Driver Established Through Evidence of Eye-Witness and Police Papers; No Ground to Interfere with Tribunal's Findings.

The appellant, Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and Aw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Award of Container Terminal Contract to PSA International. Court holds that the petitioner failed to establish any public interest or mala fides in the tender process for the 4th Container Terminal at JNPT.

The petitioner, Mandar Narhari Parab, claiming to be a journalist, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging the d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Disqualification from Tender for Violation of Non-Compete Clause. Clause 8.31 of Licence Agreement Between GTI and JNPT Prohibited Promoters from Bidding for Competing Projects, and Subsequent Government Policy Could Not Be Read into Existing Contract.

The petitioner, APM Terminals B.V., a Dutch company, along with Container Corporation of India Ltd (CONCOR), formed a joint venture company called Gat...