Search Results for "confiscation proceedings"

188 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 188 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Partly Allows State's Revision in Essential Commodities Case — Confiscation Reduced from 100% to 20% Upheld. Appellate Court's Discretion to Modify Confiscation Under Section 6A of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 Upheld as Not Perverse.

The State of Gujarat filed a Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challengin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Revision in Essential Commodities Act Confiscation Case — Reduction of Confiscation from 100% to 20% Upheld. Appellate court's modification of confiscation order was found to be within its discretion and not requiring interference.

The State of Gujarat filed a Criminal Revision Application under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, aggrieved ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order Setting Aside Penalty and Confiscation. Import of Vessels for Offshore Exploration Not Liable to Penalty Under Customs Act for Alleged Misdeclaration of Value.

The Commissioner of Customs (Imports), Mumbai, filed an appeal under Section 130(1) of the Customs Act, 1962 against a common order dated 14th August ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Release of Confiscated Truck in Forest Offence Case — Petitioner Not Given Adequate Opportunity of Hearing. Confiscation Order Under Section 61-A of Indian Forest Act, 1927 Set Aside Due to Violation of Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, owner of a truck bearing registration number MH-30-B-2897, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Cross-Examination in Customs Show Cause Proceedings - Right to Cross-Examine Witnesses Whose Statements Are Relied Upon Is a Fundamental Principle of Natural Justice

The petitioner, Kalpena Industries Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in manufacturing polyethylene/polypropylene ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CEGAT Order for Non-Consideration of Submissions in Customs Seizure Case. Tribunal's Order Held Invalid as It Did Not Constitute a Decision in the Eye of Law Under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, M/s. Wall Street Finance Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 3rd February, 2000 passed by the Customs, Excise and G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Confiscation Case — Goods Not Liable for Confiscation Under Section 111(d) or 111(m) of Customs Act, 1962. Supplier's Innocent Involvement and Lack of Misdeclaration by Respondent Lead to Dismissal.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise, Goa, under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, against a common...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Union of India in Customs Gold Confiscation Case — Confessional Statements Under Section 108 of Customs Act, 1962 Are Admissible Evidence and Cannot Be Discarded Without Proof of Coercion.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India and the Commissioner of Customs (Prev.) against an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appe...