Search Results for "compulsory bail"

94 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 94 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Judicial Officer for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Natural Justice. Recommendation by Review Committee before amendment of Rule 19 cannot be basis for order under amended rule without fresh consideration.

The petitioner, a Judicial Officer, challenged an order of compulsory retirement dated 28.09.2011 passed under the Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Holds Section 195A IPC Non-Cognizable and Bailable in Perjury-Related Threat Case. Threatening to Give False Evidence is a Species of Perjury and Must Be Classified Accordingly Under the First Schedule to CrPC.

The Supreme Court, in this judgment, addressed the classification of the offence under Section 195A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC), which crimin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 53-A CrPC for Medical Examination of Accused in Rape Cases. Challenge to police notice for medical examination dismissed as Section 53-A is not violative of Article 20(3) or Article 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Shreemad Jagadguru Shankaracharya Shree Shree Raghaveshwara Bharati Swamiji, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Union of India's Writ Petition Challenging CAT Order to Pay Full Salary During Suspension Period — Suspension Allowance Already Paid, No Entitlement to Full Salary Without Work.

The petitioners, Union of India and the General Manager, Ordnance Factory, Varangaon, challenged the judgment and order dated 09.03.2005 passed by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Uncorroborated Trap Proceedings. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, M.C. Manjunatha, was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Mysore, in Special Case No. 69/2004 for offences puni...