Search Results for "comprehensive adjudication"

409 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 409 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Lays Down Guidelines to Address Delay in Pronouncement of Reserved Judgments by High Courts — Right to Speedy Justice Under Article 21. The Court held that inordinate delay in delivery of reserved judgments violates Article 21 and issued binding guidelines for timely pronouncement.

The Supreme Court of India, in a suo motu exercise expanding the scope of individual writ petitions seeking pronouncement of reserved judgments, addre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."

The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.

The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insolvent's Application to Set Aside Ex-Parte Adjudication Order in Insolvency Proceedings — Delay of 22 Days Condoned. The court held that the Insolvent had sufficient cause for non-appearance and that the ex-parte order was passed without proper service of notice.

The case involves an application by the Insolvent, Parmanand Sitlaprasad Pandey, seeking to set aside an ex-parte adjudication order passed in insolve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Businessman with 50% Disability. Compensation enhanced from Rs. 3,50,000 to Rs. 9,27,000 by applying correct multiplier of 18, adding future prospects, and not deducting personal expenses.

The appellant, Ramchand Kishnani, a businessman aged 42, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensatio...