Search Results for "competent authority order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "competent authority order"

9981 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9981 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Evaluates Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Distinction Between Public Order and Law and Order. Predicate Offences Involving Property Dispute and House Trespass May Not Justify Preventive Detention as Activities Prejudicial to Maintenance of Public Order.

17 Sep 2021

This writ petition challenged a preventive detention order passed under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlord...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Preventive Detention Under MPDA Act for Alleged Dangerous Person; Emphasizes Distinction Between Public Order and Law and Order. Detention Order Challenged on Grounds That Alleged Acts Only Breached Law and Order and Not Public Order Under Section 3 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

2 Sep 2021

The case involved a writ petition filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging a preventive detention order passed under Section 3 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Notices Against Defendant in Patent Infringement Suit — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court holds that breach of an order must be willful and deliberate to constitute contempt under Order 39 Rule 2A CPC, and mere technical or inadvertent violations do not attract punishment.

28 Jun 2016

The Plaintiff, CTR Manufacturing Industries Ltd., filed a patent infringement suit against Sergi Transformer Explosion Prevention Technologies Pvt. Lt...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Order at Pre-Execution Stage Due to Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Exercise of Power. Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Relevant Material and Grounds of Detention Were Vague and Stale.

19 Jun 2021

The petitioner, Karnaram Lumbaji Choudhary, challenged a detention order dated 8th March 2018 passed by the Joint Secretary, Government of India, unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Petition Challenging Order of Competent Authority Cancelling Sale Deed Under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. Issues Include Effect of Exemption Under Section 20(1)(a) on Transfer Restrictions and Abatement of Appeal Due to Repeal Act, 1999.

7 May 2025

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged the order dated 24-07-2008 passed by the Additional Commissioner (Appellate Authori...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Jurisdiction of State Tax Officer Under IGST; Confiscation of Arecanut Goods Upheld. Court Holds that Section 4 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Does Not Require Separate Notification for Cross-Empowerment of State Officers.

5 Mar 2025

The petitioner, a proprietorship concern dealing in arecanut, challenged a series of orders passed by the Commercial Tax Officer (Enforcement) under t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Society's Petition, Quashes Revision Order Against Re-Audit Report Under Section 81(6) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act. Re-audit report is a mere opinion, not a decision or order, and revision under Section 154 is not maintainable.

4 Feb 2025

The Bombay High Court dealt with two writ petitions arising from a dispute concerning the re-audit of a cooperative society registered under the Mahar...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Detention of Goods under IGST: State Commercial Tax Officer Held to Have Jurisdiction Under Section 4 of IGST Despite No Separate Notification. Cross-Empowerment Under Section 4 of IGST Is Default Rule; No Separate Notification Required for State Officers' Jurisdiction Under IGST.

5 Mar 2025

The Karnataka High Court considered a writ petition filed by a proprietorship concern challenging orders of extension of physical verification, confis...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Interim Order in Criminal Proceedings Due to Lack of Reasons and Improper Exercise of Inherent Powers. The Court Held That Blanket 'No Coercive Measures' Orders Without Conditions and Reasons Are Impermissible Under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and Article 226 of the Constitution, as They Hamper Investigation and Bypass Anticipatory Bail Provisions.

13 Apr 2021

The dispute arose from an interim order dated 28.09.2020 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in a writ petition fil...

High Court

Bombay High Court considered a writ petition challenging an Additional Commissioner's order that set aside an eviction order and remanded a leave and licence dispute for fresh evidence. The Court distinguished Supreme Court precedents on delayed judgment pronouncement, noting that Order 20 CPC does not apply to the High Court and that the judgment had been dictated in open court.

7 Aug 2023

The writ petition was filed before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 7 October 2014 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Konkan Divis...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)