Search Results for "circular prospective effect"

285 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 285 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Sets Aside Industrial Court's Interim Order in Wage Increment Dispute - Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation's Policy Modification Upheld Against Employee Unions

The High Court allowed the writ petitions filed by Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation challenging the Industrial Court's interim order that stayed the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Notification for Road Construction Due to Malafides and Non-Compliance with Government Circular. Acquisition Initiated at Behest of Minister Without Proper Application of Mind Under Section 6 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, Dr. Agnelo Lopes and Mr. Milton Lopes, challenged a notification dated 16th December 2009 issued under Section 6 of the Land Acquisit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator's Report in Winding Up of Transpower Engineering Ltd. — Holds Sale by Liquidator is Formal Transfer Not Subject to Differential Premium. Court exercises powers under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956 to waive extension charges claimed by MIDC.

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions regarding the sale of two industrial plots allotted by MIDC to Transpower Engineering Ltd. (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Disqualification from Tender for Violation of Non-Compete Clause. Clause 8.31 of Licence Agreement Between GTI and JNPT Prohibited Promoters from Bidding for Competing Projects, and Subsequent Government Policy Could Not Be Read into Existing Contract.

The petitioner, APM Terminals B.V., a Dutch company, along with Container Corporation of India Ltd (CONCOR), formed a joint venture company called Gat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Premium Claim Under REP Circulars — Policy Change Prospective, No Vested Right to Premium on Licenses Issued Prior to Amendment.

The petitioners, Kagaz Packaging (a partnership firm) and its partner Ms. Rajul Manoj Shah, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging...