Search Results for "cinema"

317 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 317 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court at Bombay Partly Allows Cinema Owner's Petition Against Entertainment Tax Demand and Penalty — Exemption Does Not Absolve Liability for Tax Collected from Customers, But Penalty Set Aside as Excessive.

The petitioner, Minakshi Chitra Mandir, a cinema hall in Sailu, District Parbhani, was granted exemption from payment of entertainment tax under the M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Copyright Dispute Over Film 'Sheela' — Prima Facie Finding of Valid Assignment Chain. Court holds that registered assignments under Section 48 of the Copyright Act, 1957 prevail over unregistered subsequent assignments.

The dispute concerns the copyright in the 1987 Hindi motion picture 'Sheela', originally produced by BS Dwarakish. Goldmines Telefilms Pvt Ltd filed a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder in Communal Riots Case — Sentence Enhanced to Seven Years. The Court affirmed that identification by injured eyewitness and recovery of weapons on appellant's confession were sufficient to prove guilt under Section 307 read with Section 114 IPC.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal of Mustak @ Kanio Ahmed Shaikh against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had affirmed his convictio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Seeking to Bring Internet Streaming Under Cinematograph Act, 1952. Definition of 'cinematograph' under Section 2(c) does not include transmission through internet.

The petitioner, Mr. Padmanabh Shankar, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Investment Dispute. Court upholds award of damages for breach of investment agreement, finding no patent illegality or perversity in arbitrator's findings.

The case involves a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to an arbitral award dated 15th June 2017. The petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal of Cinema Theatre in ESI Act Coverage Dispute — Employees of Contractor and Cycle Stand Not Counted for Threshold. Handbill Boys Held Not Employees Under Section 2(9) of ESI Act, 1948 as Work Not Incidental to Cinema Business.

The appellant, M/s. Natraj Cinema, a partnership firm running a cinema theatre in Nagpur, challenged an order dated 21.09.2005 passed by the Industria...