WRIT PETITION NO. 1897 OF 2012
27 Sep 2012Background: The petitioner, a Legal Advisor employed by Aurangabad Municipal Corporation, alleged that the Municipal Commissioner, Respondent No.4, ha...
Search Results for "charge sheet permission"
1526 result(s) found
Found 1526 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court Order Granting Permission to Private Person to Conduct Prosecution Under Section 302 CrPC. Permission Cannot Be Granted Mechanically Merely Because Applicant Is an Aggrieved Party; Exceptional Circumstances Required.
9 Aug 2019The appeal arose from an order of the Bombay High Court allowing respondent No. 2 (the complainant) to conduct prosecution under Section 302 of the Co...
- 228
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses ESIC Petition Challenging CAT Order Setting Aside Termination Based on Admission of Charges. Admission of Charges in Disciplinary Inquiry Requires Closure of Inquiry; Further Proceedings Violate Natural Justice.
14 Mar 2014The Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) challenged the judgment of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) which set aside the termination...
- 170
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Company and Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case — Lack of Evidence of Mens Rea and Vicarious Liability. Court holds that mere issuance of cheque by a company employee without authorization or knowledge of directors does not attract Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the company or its directors in absence of specific averments and proof of involvement.
27 Jul 2017The petitioners, M/s Dream Logistics India Pvt. Ltd. and its directors, filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution ...
- 116
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Director of Mines in CBI Case Alleging Criminal Conspiracy and Abuse of Official Position — Held That No Prima Facie Case Made Out for Framing of Charges Under IPC and PC Act. Reconstitution of Partnership Firm Does Not Require Transfer Permission Under Rule 37 of Mineral Concession Rules, 1960; Bonafide Administrative Decision Protected Under Section 27 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.
7 Jan 2020The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M.E. Shivalingamurthy, the former Director of Mines and Geology of Karnataka, against the High Court's o...
- 271
High Court
Bombay High Court Pronounces on MSEDCL's Challenge to Order Permitting Single Point Supply to Condominium Under Section 127 Electricity Act. Appellate Authority Allowed Developer to Supply Electricity to Unit Holders through HT Connection Without Individual Connections.
7 Aug 2018The dispute pertains to the legality of single point electricity supply to a condominium complex known as Great Eastern Plaza in Pune. The petitioner,...
- 41
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Dispute Case — Holds Magistrate Can Order Further Investigation Post-Cognizance Under Section 173(8) CrPC. The Court clarified that the power to order further investigation is not extinguished by filing of charge-sheet or taking of cognizance, and can be exercised before commencement of trial.
16 Oct 2019The case arises from an FIR lodged on 22.12.2009 by Nitinbhai Mangubhai Patel, Power-of-Attorney holder of Ramanbhai Bhagubhai Patel and Shankarbhai B...
- 236
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court's Interim Order Restraining Filing of Charge-Sheet in Property Dispute Case. The Court held that the High Court cannot restrain filing of charge-sheet under Section 193(3) BNSS while a quashment petition is pending, as it affects the statutory right of investigation.
12 May 2026The Supreme Court set aside an interim order of the Allahabad High Court that restrained the investigating officer from filing the charge-sheet in a c...
- 299
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty in Railway Disciplinary Case for Violation of Natural Justice — Failure to Supply Documents and Inadequate Inquiry. Central Administrative Tribunal's order set aside as disciplinary authority imposed penalty without providing relevant documents to the employee, violating principles of natural justice under Railway Service Conduct Rules, 1966.
8 May 2013The petitioner, R.C. Dahore, was a Divisional Electrical Engineer with Western Railway. He was appointed as an Apprentice Mechanic (Electrical) and la...
- 48
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Notice sent to wrong address invalidates proceedings under Section 138 of NI Act.
13 Jan 2020The petitioners, accused Nos.4, 6, and 5 in C.C.No.5577/2012 pending before the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, filed a petiti...
- 118
