Search Results for "charge holder"

1273 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1273 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Seeking Priority Over Sales Tax Dues. Sales Tax Department's First Charge Under Section 38C of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 Prevails Over Secured Creditor's Rights Under Securitisation Act, 2002.

The Thane Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. (the Bank) filed a writ petition challenging the action of the Sales Tax Department in attaching the property of M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Lack of Liability Proof. Complainant failed to establish legally enforceable debt as accused was not the drawer of the cheque under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Kisan R. Gate, the Power of Attorney holder of Vaishali Sanjay Jaiswal, challenging the acq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Bond Redemption Dispute, Upholding Defendant's Compliance with RBI Directives. Interest on Delayed Payment Not Payable Due to Regulatory Embargo and Pending Liquidation Proceedings Under Companies Act, 1956.

The dispute arose from a suit filed by M/s. SIBCO Investment Pvt Ltd against Small Industries Development Bank of India seeking interest on alleged be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Consumer Complaint Against Postal Authorities in Kisan Vikas Patra Fraud Case. Postal authorities not vicariously liable for agent's fraud as payment was made to holder under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and appellants' negligence in signing instruments contributed to loss.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by Pradeep Kumar and Raj Rani against postal authorities, including the Post Master General and othe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal Under Section 138 NI Act. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Arises When Signature on Cheque is Admitted, and Burden Shifts to Accused to Rebut.

The appellant, Shriniwas Ramdas Siwerwat, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Shantara...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 applies when signature on cheque is admitted, shifting burden on accused to rebut existence of debt.

The appellant, Bapurao s/o Motiram Mankar, a senior citizen, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Transfer Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case, Upholds Jurisdiction Under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Bank’s Right to Choose Jurisdiction for Cheque Dishonour Cases Upheld – Transfer Denied Under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Depository Against Arbitral Award for Lost Shares Due to Third-Party Fraud. Court Holds That Depository Not Liable Absent Negligence or Breach of Contract Under Section 12(1-A) of SEBI Act, 1992.

The case involves an appeal by Central Depository Services (India) Ltd. (CDSL) against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 01/12/2025, which up...