Search Results for "capital value method"

143 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 143 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Municipal Corporation in Water Tax Levy Under UP Water Supply and Sewerage Act, 1975 - Reverses Refund Order. Water and Sewerage Tax Imposed on Premises is Valid as Tax on Lands and Buildings Under Entry 49 of List II, Not a Fee, Under Section 52(1)(a) of the Act.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by the first respondent, Pradeshiya Industrial and Investment Corporation, challenging the levy of water ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Deceased was a 60-year-old agriculturist earning Rs.6,000 per month; Tribunal's notional income of Rs.4,500 per month enhanced to Rs.6,000 per month with multiplier of 9 and 1/3rd deduction for personal expenses.

The appeal was filed by the claimants (wife and children of the deceased Buddappa) under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence for Brutal Rape and Murder of Two-Year-Old Child. Circumstantial Evidence and Medical Testimony Confirm Guilt Under Sections 302, 363, 376, 377 IPC.

The case involves the brutal kidnapping, rape, unnatural offence, and murder of a two-year-old girl by the appellant, Ravi S/o Ashok Ghumare, in Jalna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case: Subscriptions Received Under Collective Investment Schemes Held to be Capital Receipts Not Income. Peerless General Finance's Subscriptions Not Forfeited During Assessment Years, Hence Not Taxable as Income.

The appeal arose from a dispute between The Peerless General Finance and Investment Company Ltd. (appellant) and the Commissioner of Income Tax (respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasons to Believe Income Escaped Assessment. Reassessment Based on Change of Opinion Regarding Cost of Acquisition Under Section 55(2)(b)(ii) is Invalid.

The petitioner, J.B. Amin & Brothers (HUF), owned land at Aurangpura, Aurangabad, purchased by late Balubhai Amin for Rs.1,80,000. After his death in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Depreciation on Original Cost in Amalgamation Case Under Rule 10 of Income Tax Rules. Notional Depreciation to Non-Resident Parent Does Not Reduce Written Down Value for Successor Company.

The case involves an Income Tax Reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the assessment years 1976-77, 1977-78, and 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Sanctions Scheme of Arrangement for Amalgamation of Five Transferor Companies with Unichem Laboratories Limited. Scheme held fair and reasonable under Sections 391-394 of Companies Act, 1956, despite shareholder objection.

The judgment concerns five Company Scheme Petitions filed under Sections 391 to 394 read with Sections 80, 100 to 103 of the Companies Act, 1956, seek...