Search Results for "bribe"

749 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 749 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Talathi in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Independent Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Appasaheb Narayan Jadhav, a Talathi (public servant) in Dafalapur, Sangli, was convicted by the Special Judge, Sangli, for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Quash FIR in Corruption Case Against Police Constable. Court holds that Anti Corruption Bureau is a police station under Section 2(s) CrPC and registration of FIR by its officer is valid.

The petitioner, a police constable, was caught red-handed accepting a bribe of Rs.18,000/- in a trap laid by the Anti Corruption Bureau (ACB), Mumbai....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Demand for Bribe Not Proved. Acquittal of Head Constable under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(1)(d) read with 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Upheld Due to Inconsistent Evidence.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 23/3/1990 passed by the Special Judge, Sangli in Special Case No.8 of 1986, whe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 161 IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Sham Namdev Sonawane, a Forester, for offences under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(1)(d) r/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Proof of Demand and Acceptance. Acquittal of Accused Under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1948 Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Establish Essential Ingredients.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 23.7.1990 passed by the Special Judge, Thane, in Special Case No. 9 of 1985, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 161 IPC and Section 5(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Special Judge, Sangli in Special Case No.1 of 1987, which acquitted the respondent-accus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 5(1)(d) read with Section 5(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 and Section 161 IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, in Special Case No.2/88, acquitting the respondent-ac...