Search Results for "bonafide tenant"

271 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 271 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree for Non-User and Subletting of Tenanted Shop. Tenant's Use of Premises as Godown for Grocery Items Held to Be Change of User and Subletting to Brother Constitutes Unauthorized Transfer.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the defendants (tenants) against a decree of eviction passed by the trial court and confirmed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Eviction Suit for Willful Default and Subletting. Landlord's Bonafide Need for Business Expansion Upheld as Trial Court and Appellate Court Concurrent Findings Not Disturbed Under Article 227.

The petitioner, Sou. Bhamabai, wife of Ananda Raut, was defendant no.3 in a suit for eviction filed by the landlords (respondent nos.1 and 2) against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition, Upholds Eviction Decree Under Section 15(3) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Tenant's Admission of Higher Rent and Failure to Deposit Arrears Justified Eviction.

The petitioner, a tenant, challenged the eviction decree passed under Section 15(3) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, as upheld by the first ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Petition Challenging Remand Order in Rent Control Matter. Landlord Held Ineligible for Permission Under Clause 13(3)(vi) of C.P. and Berar Letting of Premises and Rent Control Order, 1949 Due to Availability of Other Suitable Accommodation.

The petitioner, Purushottam Ramlal Shukla, is the landlord of premises at Dharampeth, Nagpur, comprising two rooms admeasuring 22 ft. x 33 ft. let out...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction Decree for Landlady's Bonafide Need Under Section 13(1)(g) of Bombay Rent Act. Landlady's Requirement for Starting Business for Herself and Husband Held Genuine and Reasonable.

The present writ petition was filed by the tenant, Natwarlal Dahyabhai Shah (since deceased through L.Rs.), challenging the orders of the courts below...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Bona Fide Need for Hotel Business Established. Landlord's son's need for premises to start hotel business held genuine and reasonable under Section 16 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case arises from a civil suit filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against the applicants (original defendants) for possession of suit p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction Decree Under Maharashtra Rent Act, 1999 — Notice Under Section 15 Held Valid Despite Inclusion of Time-Barred Rent Claim, but Eviction on Bonafide Need Set Aside as Landlord Gave Up That Ground.

The petitioner, a tenant, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order dated 27/4/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Eviction Petition in Rent Control Case — Arrears of Rent and Bonafide Requirement Not Proven. Tenant's Deposit of Standard Rent and Continued Business Use Defeated Claims Under Bombay Rent Act.

The petitioner, Trilokchand Shantilal Badjate, as landlord, filed a civil suit before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Malegaon seeking eviction of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Landlord-Tenant Relationship Established Through Rent Receipts and Admission.

The petitioner, Smt. Kausalyabai Kisan Chavan, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and decre...