Search Results for "biological age"

307 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 307 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Father for Rape of Minor Daughter Under POCSO Act and IPC. Father-Daughter Relationship Aggravates Offence; Medical Evidence and Victim Testimony Sufficient for Conviction.

The appellant, Bandu Vishwanath Matte, was convicted by the Extra Joint District Judge & Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Special (POCSO) Case...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and IPC Rape Case Due to Unproven Minority Status and Negative DNA Evidence - Benefit of Doubt Granted

The appellant was convicted by the Trial Court for offences under IPC and POCSO Act for allegedly having forcible sexual intercourse with a minor vict...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Conviction Under Indian Penal Code and Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act Upheld – DNA Evidence Confirmed Biological Parentage

Conviction and Sentence Confirmed – Consent Obtained Under Misconception of Fact – Victim Below Eighteen Years of Age (a) Consent of Minor Irrele...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Cancellation of Earthquake Affected Person Certificate — Tahsildar Cannot Review Civil Court Decree. Circular Issued by Collector Cannot Override Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956.

The petitioner, originally the biological son of Shankar Ramu Pawar, was given in adoption to Lalu Shivram Jadhav and his wife on 18.04.2022 through a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age — Benefit of Doubt Given as Prosecution Failed to Establish Minority of Prosecutrix Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 4, 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 363, 376 IPC.

The appellant, Ashik Ramjan Ansari, was convicted by the Special Judge at Greater Bombay in POCSO Special Case No.203 of 2016 for offences under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Adoption by Single Woman Under Juvenile Justice Act — Rejects District Judge's Erroneous Finding on Eligibility. Single woman eligible to adopt under Section 56(2) of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and Adoption Regulations, 2017.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (JJ Act) by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Passport Authority to Accept Application in Adopted Child's New Name — Adoption Valid Under Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956. Passport Authority Cannot Refuse Application Based on Name Change After Valid Adoption, as Adoption Deed is Sufficient Proof of Name Change.

The petitioner, Jigna Mahesh Dedhia, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the passport authorit...