Search Results for "arrest warrants"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "arrest warrants"

274 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 274 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Criminal Petition Against Orders Directing Regular Bail Despite Subsisting Anticipatory Bail. Held That Filing of Charge-Sheet Does Not Terminate Anticipatory Bail; Accused Need Not Apply for Regular Bail Unless Bail Order Limits Duration, per Sushila Aggarwal v. State.

23 Jun 2026

The petitioners, accused of offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Dowry Prohibition Act in Crime No. 115/2025, were granted anticipatory ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Direction for Accused on Anticipatory Bail to Obtain Regular Bail Despite Subsisting Anticipatory Bail. Filing of Charge-Sheet Does Not Terminate Anticipatory Bail Under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Now Section 482 of BNSS), and the Accused Need Not Seek Regular Bail.

23 Jun 2026

This criminal petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) was filed by three accused persons challenging orders ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Summons Issued Under Section 126 BNSS for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards. The Court Holds That Executive Magistrate Must First Pass Order Under Section 130 BNSS Before Issuing Summons.

15 Dec 2025

The writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenged the summons dated 30.09.2025 issued by the Executive Magistrate (Respondent No.3) unde...

Tribunals

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Allows Execution Appeals Against Builder for Non-Compliance of Consent Order. Builder Failed to Deliver Possession and Pay Compensation as Per Settlement, Leading to Remand for Fresh Consideration.

10 Jun 2025

The present appeals arise out of two execution applications filed by the complainants, Shivani Aggarwal and Sunita Jain, against the builder, Pranav A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Anticipatory Bail Orders in Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) Prosecution Under Companies Act, 2013. The High Court erred in granting anticipatory bail as Section 212(6) of the Companies Act, 2013, bars application of Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and the accused's evasion of warrants in economic offences involving large-scale fraud justified strict approach.

9 Apr 2025

The Supreme Court dealt with a batch of sixteen appeals arising from criminal proceedings initiated by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Indonesian National in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling and Search Procedures. Conviction for possession of 3.930 kg Methamphetamine set aside as prosecution failed to follow Section 52-A NDPS Act sampling requirements and Section 50 search safeguards.

30 Apr 2021

The appellant, an Indonesian national, was convicted by the Special Judge under the NDPS Act for possession of 3.930 kg of Methamphetamine and sentenc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Larger Bench Whether Investigation by Complainant Police Officer Under NDPS Act Vitiate Trial — Mohan Lal Decision's Applicability Examined. The court considers the conflict between Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab (holding trial vitiated) and Varinder Kumar v. State of Himachal Pradesh (holding prospective application) and refers the matter to a five-judge bench.

31 Aug 2020

This judgment arises from a batch of special leave petitions challenging convictions under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Sheriff's Poundage Payable on Settlement Amounts in Admiralty Suits — Admiralty Jurisdiction — Sheriff's Fees — Table of Fees under Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 — Court ruled that poundage is payable on the amount for which the vessel is released, including settlement sums, and not merely on the value of the vessel as per the warrant of arrest, and that the Sheriff is entitled to poundage even if the suit is settled before actual sale, as the Sheriff's services in effecting arrest and maintaining custody are rendered.

17 Jan 2018

The Bombay High Court addressed two unrelated admiralty suits tagged together to decide a common issue regarding the payment of poundage to the Sherif...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Applications to Vacate Arrest of Vessels in Bunker Supply Disputes Involving Insolvent Intermediary. Maritime Claim for Bunkers Supplied to Vessel Held Enforceable In Rem Despite Lack of Privity Between Supplier and Owner.

15 Apr 2015

The High Court of Bombay heard two notices of motion filed by the defendants in two admiralty suits seeking to vacate the arrest of their vessels. The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Vacation of Vessel Arrest in Admiralty Suit for Bunker Supply Claim. The court held that the Single Judge erred in vacating the arrest and directing security without proper findings of mala fides.

27 Apr 2010

The appellant, Chemoil Adani Pvt. Ltd., filed an admiralty suit against the vessel m.v. Hansa Sonderburg and its owners for recovery of dues for suppl...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)