Search Results for "army rules"

178 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 178 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against Air Force School Not Being 'State' Under Article 12. Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Not Available Against Air Force School Managed by Non-Government Society Funded by Non-Public Funds.

The Supreme Court dismissed two civil appeals challenging the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which held that the Air Force School, Bamrauli, is ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Army Personnel Dismissed for Overstaying Leave on Compassionate Grounds. Held that absence due to wife's illness with medical certificates constituted sufficient cause under Section 39(b) of the Army Act, 1950.

The appellant, Ex Sepoy Madan Prasad, was enrolled in the Army Service Corps on 4th January 1983 as a Mechanical Transport Driver. In 1998, he was gra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated Against Army Officer for Financial Irregularities. Court upholds Tribunal's refusal to quash proceedings, finding no violation of natural justice or mala fides.

The appellant, Brigadier L.I. Singh, was commissioned in the Indian Army in 1983 and served as Commander of 164 Mountain Brigade from December 2011 to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Army Personnel Discharged on Four Red Ink Entries, Orders Reinstatement with Benefits. Discharge under Rule 13(3)(III)(v) of Army Rules, 1954 set aside as mechanical without considering long service and nature of minor offences.

The appellant, Narain Singh, was enrolled in the Indian Army as a Driver on 15.10.1980 and rose to the rank of Lance Dafedar. After serving for 13 yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Family Pension Claim for Widow of Army Jawan Discharged Without Invalidation Medical Board. Discharge on Medical Grounds Requires Invalidation Board Under Rule 13(3)(III)(iii) of Army Rules, 1954; Residual Provision Not Applicable.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) at its Principal Bench, New Delhi, which dismissed the Original Application filed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summary Court Martial Conviction for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Evidence. Petitioner's thumb impression on payment vouchers not proved to be superimposed; conviction set aside.

The petitioner, Major Anurag Pathak, was a Company Commander in the Indian Army. During his tenure in Bhutan (1993-96), he was later called upon to re...