Search Results for "army personnel"

32 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 32 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals by Rajasthan Public Service Commission Against High Court Order Shifting Eligibility Date for Ex-servicemen Category. Press Note for Correction of Application Forms Cannot Confer Eligibility on Candidates Not Eligible on Last Date of Submission.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission against a Division Bench order of the Rajasthan High Court. The di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against Armed Forces Tribunal's Interference with Censure Punishment. The Court Held That the Tribunal Cannot Substitute Its Own Discretion for That of the Competent Authority in Awarding Censure Merely Because Different Forms of Censure Exist.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Union of India against the judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi. The re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Widow's Claim for Liberalised Family Pension in Operation Rakshak Death Case. Cardiac Failure Not Covered Under Category 'E' of Pension Instructions as Death Must Result from Injuries in Live Action.

The appellant, Kanchan Dua, is the widow of a Colonel in the Indian Army who died on 25.01.1992 due to sudden cardiac failure while posted as Commanda...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Army Personnel Discharged on Four Red Ink Entries, Orders Reinstatement with Benefits. Discharge under Rule 13(3)(III)(v) of Army Rules, 1954 set aside as mechanical without considering long service and nature of minor offences.

The appellant, Narain Singh, was enrolled in the Indian Army as a Driver on 15.10.1980 and rose to the rank of Lance Dafedar. After serving for 13 yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Army Personnel Discharged for Producing Fake Matriculation Certificate. Exoneration in Summary Court Martial Does Not Bar Discharge Proceedings Under Army Rules for Lack of Educational Qualification.

The appellant, Ex. Sepoy Surendra Singh Yadav, was enrolled in the Army on 26.04.1991. At the time of appointment, he produced a matriculation certifi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Army Washerman Discharged on Medical Grounds Without Invalidating Board. Discharge under Rule 13(3)(III)(iii) of Army Rules, 1954 requires Invalidating Board recommendation; residual clause (v) inapplicable.

The appellant, Ex-Sepoy (Washerman) Ram Khilawan, was enrolled in the Indian Army on October 23, 1987. He was discharged from service on August 31, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Ex-Sepoy Discharged on Medical Grounds Without Invalidating Board. Discharge under Rule 13(3)(III)(iii) of Army Rules, 1954 requires Invalidating Board; failure renders discharge illegal.

The appellant, Ex-Sepoy (Washerman) Ram Khilawan, was enrolled in the Indian Army on October 23, 1987. He was placed in permanent Low Medical Category...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of Army Personnel in Habitual Absence Case — Preliminary Enquiry Requirement Satisfied. Repeated Red Ink Entries for Absence from Duty Justify Discharge Under Army Instructions, No Regular Enquiry Needed.

The appellant, Sep. Satgur Singh, was a member of the Indian Army who served for 11 years, 9 months, and 15 days. During his service, he was awarded s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Army Personnel Dismissed for Disobeying Lawful Command. Termination Upheld as Disobedience of Superior's Orders on Two Occasions Constitutes Serious Misconduct in Armed Forces.

The appellant, Rabindra Kumar Shaw, was enrolled in the Indian Army on 27.07.2000 and posted with the 9th Corps Air Support Signal Unit. On 30.07.2009...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds CBI Investigation and Enhances Compensation in Army Custodial Death Case. The court affirmed the High Court's direction for CBI probe into the death of a civilian allegedly killed in army custody and increased compensation from Rs. 3 lakhs to Rs. 5 lakhs under Article 142.

The case arises from the death of Someswar Gayari alias Sombrom, who was allegedly taken into custody by army personnel of the 8th Madras Regiment on ...