Search Results for "arbitrator fees"

303 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 303 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal, Restores Arbitral Award in Contractor vs. Irrigation Corporation Dispute. Court Holds That Section 34 Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction by Reappreciating Evidence and Setting Aside Award on Grounds Not Permitted Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The present Commercial Arbitration Appeal was filed by M/s. Shinde & Sons, a contractor, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 199...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment of Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Over Excess Payments and Blacklisting — Limitation Period Not Barred as Dispute Continued and Final Bill Not Rejected.

The case involves a dispute between Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board (the Board) and Saryu Plastics Pvt. Ltd. (the Company) regarding supply co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"A Case Examining Limitation and Arbitration in Franchise Disputes."

The Supreme Court ruled on the issue of whether the arbitration petition filed by Arif Azim Co. Ltd. was barred by limitation under Article 137 of the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Enforces Foreign Award in Two-Tier Arbitration — Holds ICC Award Enforceable Despite Prior Indian Award. Two-Tier Arbitration Clause Valid Under Indian Law; Natural Justice Opportunity Afforded to Respondent.

The dispute arose from a contract between Centrotrade Minerals and Metals Inc., a US corporation, and Hindustan Copper Ltd. (HCL) for the sale of copp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Guarantor's Challenge to Ex-Parte Arbitral Awards in Favor of Tata Capital Financial Services Limited. Lack of Proper Service and Limitation Barred Setting Aside of Awards Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns four arbitration petitions filed by Sawarmal Gadodia, a guarantor, challenging ex-parte arbitral awards passed against him in fa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Advertising Contract Dispute — Petitioner's Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Fails. Court Held That Arbitrator's Findings on Breach and Quantum Were Not Patently Illegal or Against Public Policy.

The petitioner, M/s Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an ar...