Search Results for "arbitration award enforcement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "arbitration award enforcement"

420 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 420 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Commercial Contract Dispute — Joint and Several Liability of Holding Company and Subsidiary Upheld. Division Bench's restoration of award under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 affirmed, rejecting challenge on grounds of patent illegality and public policy.

3 Sep 2024

The case arises from a dispute between OPG Power Generation Private Limited (OPG) and its holding company Gita Power and Infrastructure Private Limite...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Defence Contract Dispute Over Encashment of Warranty Bond. The court held that the claims were not barred by limitation as bilateral discussions continued until 2019, and the arbitration clause covered the dispute.

18 May 2023

The petitioner, a Swiss company engaged in arms manufacturing, entered into a contract with the Ministry of Defence, Government of India, for supply o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Enforcement of Foreign Award Against NAFED in Groundnut Export Dispute — Government Refusal Does Not Excuse Breach Under FOSFA Contract. The court held that a canalizing agency cannot rely on its own lack of permission as a force majeure event under Clause 14 of the FOSFA 20 Contract, and enforcement of the award is not against public policy despite procedural irregularities.

22 Apr 2020

The case involves a dispute between National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India (NAFED), a canalizing agency for the Government of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Agency Agreement Dispute — Upholds Claim for Outstanding Invoices but Remits Interest Calculation. The court held that the arbitrator's award of interest at 18% per annum from the date of each invoice was contrary to the contract and Section 31(7)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, which requires interest to run from the date of cause of action unless otherwise agreed.

21 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Aero Club, filed two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 14t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Share Purchase Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's findings on fraud, jurisdiction, and liability, rejecting allegations of perversity and violation of natural justice.

28 Sep 2015

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Avitel Post Studioz Ltd. and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Foreign Award — Part I of Arbitration Act Inapplicable. Section 34 petition under Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 held not maintainable for foreign award with seat in London.

20 Jan 2015

The appeal arose from an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the appellant's arbitration petition under section 34 of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Referral to Arbitration in Shipping Agency Dispute — Agency Agreement Arbitration Clause Enforceable Under Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court holds that disputes regarding termination and novation of agency agreement are covered by arbitration clause and must be referred to arbitration in Tokyo.

28 Jan 2014

The judgment concerns two interconnected proceedings: Arbitration Petition No. 446 of 2003 filed by Mitsui OSK Lines Ltd. (petitioner) under Section 4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Single Judge's Order in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute — Parties Did Not Exclude Part-I of Arbitration Act by Choosing Foreign Law and Seat Abroad. The Court held that under the Bhatia International regime, Part-I of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 applies to international commercial arbitrations held outside India unless expressly or impliedly excluded, and mere choice of foreign law and seat does not constitute implied exclusion.

6 Aug 2013

The appeal arose from a judgment of a Learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 15 November 2011, which held that the Court had no jurisdict...

High Court

Bombay High Court Enforces Foreign Arbitral Award in Favor of Singapore Seller Against Indian Buyer. Rejects Objections Based on Conflicting Jurisdiction Clauses and Public Policy Under Section 48 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Feb 2013

The petitioner, M/s. Louis Dreyfus Commodities Asia Pte Ltd., a Singapore-based company, filed a petition under Sections 47 and 48 of the Arbitration ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction in Hotel Agreement Termination Dispute. Court holds that no part of cause of action arose within its territorial jurisdiction under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Rockwood Hotels & Resorts Limited, a company with its registered office in Mumbai, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)