Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "arbitral tribunal jurisdiction"

1336 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1336 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Constitution Bench Examines Applicability of Part I of Arbitration Act, 1996 to Foreign-Seated Arbitrations. Reference Arises from Conflicting Views in Bhatia International and Venture Global Engineering.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court of India, by a reference order dated 16 January 2008, directed the listing of Civil Appeal No. 7019 of 2005 and connected matters be...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge to Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 7.39 Crore with Interest. Limitation plea rejected as claim was within time; quantification not perverse.

2 Apr 2026

The judgment concerns a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition and Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Equipment Supply Dispute — Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator Justifies Court Intervention. Existence of Arbitration Clause Confirmed; Court's Role Limited to Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

12 Nov 2024

The petitioner, Master Drilling India Private Limited, entered into an Equipment Supply Agreement dated 01.10.2021 with the respondent, Sarel Drill & ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in International Commercial Arbitration for Violation of Natural Justice and Patent Illegality. The court found that the arbitrator relied on unproved documents and denied adequate opportunity to the petitioner, warranting setting aside of the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Jan 2023

The petitioner, Thomas Cook (India) Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Concessionaire in Airport Metro Express Line Dispute. The court held that the Delhi High Court's interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was unjustified, as the Arbitral Tribunal's findings on defects and material breach in the concession agreement were based on evidence and within its jurisdiction.

9 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India addressed civil appeals arising from a dispute between Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. (DAMEPL), the appellant and co...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Interim Injunction in Commercial Dispute Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act — Injunction Granted Without Considering Balance of Convenience and Irreparable Injury Set Aside. The court held that an interim injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC requires satisfaction of all three principles: prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury.

22 Mar 2021

The appellants, owners of a property, entered into a development agreement with the respondent developer. Disputes arose, and the respondent filed an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Terminates Arbitrator's Mandate for Failure to Render Award and Excessive Fees — Substitute Arbitrator Appointed Under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Court held that failure to render award within reasonable time and demanding excessive fees constitute failure to act under Section 14(1)(a) of the Act.

16 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Parekh Industries Limited, filed a petition under Sections 14 and 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking terminatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Section 37 Petitions Challenging Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Restraint Order. The arbitral tribunal had restrained the appellants from alienating assets under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, pending arbitration over terminated Master Service Agreements, despite arguments that the transfer was involuntary and assets were encumbered to secured creditors.

8 Mar 2018

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard three commercial arbitration petitions filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Commodity Trading Dispute — Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Erred in Rejecting Claim for Unauthorized Trades Without Considering Evidence of Unauthorized Transactions.

9 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Mrs. Kaberi Mondal, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging portions of an arbitr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Port Development Dispute — Liquidated Damages Claim Rejected Due to Lack of Proof of Actual Loss. The court held that under Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, proof of actual loss is necessary for claiming liquidated damages, and the arbitrator's finding was not patently illegal.

10 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Board of Trustees for Jawaharlal Nehru Port, a body corporate under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, entered into a licence agreement ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)