Search Results for "animus possidendi"

50 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 50 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC where courts below have concurrently found that the plaintiff failed to prove title and possession.

The present second appeal was filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal representatives) against the judgment and decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Decree of Possession and Mesne Profits to Purchasers in Suit for Ejectment of Trespassers Based on Title. Unregistered Agreement for Sale Does Not Confer Title or Right to Possession Without Payment of Consideration.

The plaintiffs, Sharad Shantilal Chheda and Taruna Anil Chheda, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking a decree of possession and mesne profits...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Suit for Possession Based on Licence — Limitation Issue Requires Trial. Courts below erred in dismissing suit on limitation without trial on that issue.

The case involves a second appeal arising from a suit for possession filed by the appellants (plaintiffs) against the respondent (defendant). The suit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trust Property Dispute — Possession of Suit Plot Not Acquired by Government. Land Acquisition Proceedings Did Not Include the Suit Plot, Hence Government Cannot Claim Title or Possession Without Proper Acquisition Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 25.9.1995 of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Yavatmal, dismissing Special Civil Suit No.86/1994 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Fact. The court held that the appellants failed to prove title by adverse possession and that the suit was not barred by limitation under the Portuguese Civil Code.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the appellants, who were defendants in a suit for declaration of title and recovery of possession filed by ...