Search Results for "agriculturist relief"

456 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 456 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeals in Tenancy Suo Moto Revision Case — Limitation Not Applicable to Section 84C Powers. Concurrent findings of fact by revenue authorities cannot be interfered with under Article 227 unless perverse.

The case involves a set of intra-court appeals (Letters Patent Appeals) filed against a common judgment dated 21.11.2016 passed by a learned Single Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Demolition Order in Land Dispute Case — Violation of Natural Justice and Property Rights. Order passed under Section 63 of the Gujarat Land Revenue Code, 1879 without notice or hearing set aside as arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21, and 300A of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Harishbhai Vrajlal Bathia, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat High Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Revenue Authorities' Orders Cancelling Mutation Entry - Petitioner's Agriculturist Status Upheld Under Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Mutation Entry No. 1884 Restored in Favour of Petitioner

The petitioner filed a Special Civil Application under Article 227 of Constitution of India challenging orders passed by revenue authorities cancellin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landowners Challenge MIDC Over Land Classification and Compensation" "Petitioners demand reclassification and enhanced compensation for perennially-irrigated land."

The case involves a writ petition filed by Hiraman Yashwant Kathe and others challenging the decision of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corpor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion. Disqualification under Section 14(1)(j-1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 applies only to candidates for election, not to sitting members, and the no-confidence motion was validly passed.

The Petitioner, Vitthal Rajaram Shitole, was the Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Koregaonmul. He filed a writ petition challenging a no-confidence motion p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. No substantial question of law arose as the first appellate court's findings were based on evidence and not perverse under Section 100 CPC.

The present second appeal was filed by the original defendants against the judgment and decree passed by the first appellate court, which had confirme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records — Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Are Only for Fiscal Purposes Under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, Shree Sai Reality, Shree Sai Infratech, and Shree Sai Buildtech, through their partner Sandeep Dindyal Aagarval, filed a writ petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Trustees for Mismanagement of Public Trust. Trustees Failed to Maintain Accounts and Misappropriated Trust Funds, Violating Sections 41A, 41D, 50 of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950.

The case involves two writ petitions filed against the order of the Joint Charity Commissioner, Nagpur, dated 30th June 2003, removing the trustees of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widows' Petition for Succession Certificate Under Section 372 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 — Held That Widows and Minor Children of Deceased Coparceners Are Entitled to Equal Share in Joint Family Property Despite Objections by Male Coparceners.

The petitioners, being the widows and minor children of deceased coparceners (Abhay Vithal Mandle, Raosaheb Vithal Mandle, and Baban Vithal Mandle), f...