Search Results for "affirmation requirement"

216 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 216 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement to Sell Proved by Attesting Witness and Part Performance, Defendant Failed to Discharge Burden Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The present second appeal was filed by the original defendant, Madan s/o Mohan Gupta, challenging the concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice — Service of Demand Notice Under Section 138 NI Act Must Be on the Correct Address of the Drawer.

The petitioner, Pradip S. Dixit, was convicted by the Metropolitan Magistrate, 7th Court, Dadar, Mumbai, for an offence under Section 138 of the Negot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.

Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition in Property Dispute Between Near Relations — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Adverse Possession Claim Fails as Petitioner Failed to Prove Hostile Possession and Ouster of True Owner.

The dispute pertained to a property tussle between near relations. The petitioner, M/s Jwel Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., claimed title by adverse possession ov...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit, Restores Trial Court's Decree for Money Recovery Instead of Specific Performance. The High Court erred in granting specific performance as the transaction was found to be a loan with collateral security under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by the subsequent purchasers (appellants) against the High Court's decree granting specific performance of an agr...