Search Results for "advertisement discrepancy"

67 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 67 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Old Pension Scheme Benefits to Employee Appointed After Cut-Off Date When Selection Process Commenced Earlier. Part-Time Service Counted for Pension When Followed by Full-Time Appointment.

The petitioner, Anil Dhondiram Kore, was initially appointed as a part-time teacher on 30-06-1995 in a fully aided school. He worked until 30-11-2005....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CIDCO's Cancellation of Highest Bid in Tender for Plot Lease Due to Arbitrariness and Non-Application of Mind. State Instrumentality's Decision Must Be Based on Relevant Considerations and Not Inconsistent Stands.

The Bombay High Court, in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, examined the challenge by a petitioner-firm against the deci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court: Promotional Trailers Do Not Create Contractual Obligations; No Deficiency in Service or Unfair Trade Practice. Creative Freedom in Art Protects Film Producers from Consumer Claims Regarding Missing Promotional Content.

The Supreme Court addressed whether a promotional trailer creates a contractual obligation or leads to an unfair trade practice under the Consumer Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Unsuccessful Candidates in Sub-Inspector Recruitment - Upholds High Court's Decision on Minimum Qualifying Marks. Selection Process Found Lawful as Candidates Failed to Meet Minimum Marks Criteria Set by Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission.

The dispute arose from a recruitment process conducted by the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission for Sub-Inspector of Police posts through advertise...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Seniority Dispute, Quashing High Court Division Bench Judgment. Seniority lists prepared based on date of dispatch of select lists were held arbitrary and contrary to Rule 5 of Uttar Pradesh Government Servants Seniority Rules, 1991, requiring fresh merit-based list.

The dispute arose from seniority lists dated 05.09.2006 and 05.03.2010 for Junior Engineers in the Department of Minor Irrigation, Uttar Pradesh, invo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Ombudsman Report in Seniority Dispute — Seniority Determined by Date of Joining, Not Date of Recommendation by Public Service Commission.

The petitioners, including Maya M. Pednekar and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the report dated 16.02.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Public Interest Litigation Concerning Recruitment and Selection Process. Petition Challenges Appointments Made by State Authorities Alleging Irregularities in Selection.

The judgment text provided is incomplete, containing only the case heading, date, court, judges, advocates, and a list of parties. The matter is a wri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010059832012_1

The available text of the judgment only includes the list of parties in W.P.No.27674/2012 and connected cases, filed as a Public Interest Litigation b...