Search Results for "admiralty jurisdiction"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "admiralty jurisdiction"

116 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 116 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Arrest of Vessel for Maritime Claim Under Admiralty Act, 2017 — Bunker Supply Constitutes Necessaries. The court held that supply of bunkers to a vessel is a maritime claim under Section 4(1)(l) of the Admiralty (Jurisdiction & Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017, and granted conditional arrest subject to furnishing of security.

6 Feb 2026

The plaintiff, Om Freight Forwarders Limited, a company engaged in freight forwarding and bunker supply, filed a civil suit under the Admiralty (Juris...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against Order Refusing Rejection of Plaint in Commercial Suit. The petition challenges the Commercial Court's dismissal of an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for rejection of the plaint in a commercial dispute involving foreign entities.

17 Apr 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Admiralty Suit for Arrest of Vessel — Sets Aside Ex-Parte Order of Arrest for Non-Disclosure of Material Facts. Court holds that a plaintiff seeking arrest of a vessel must make full and frank disclosure of all material facts, including the existence of an arbitration agreement and the vessel's status as a River-Sea Vessel under the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958.

19 Aug 2022

The case involves an appeal by the defendants, MT Pamboor 2 (the vessel) and Shiny Shipping & Logistics Private Limited, against an ex-parte order of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Plaintiff to Bear Costs of Discharge and Storage of Arrested Cargo in Admiralty Suit. The court held that a party who secures an order of arrest of cargo cannot insist that the shipowner bear the costs of discharging and storing the cargo, as the shipowner is not a party to the arrest and the cargo is in custodia legis.

27 Jun 2016

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by the owner of the vessel m.v. Ocean 39 (the ship interests) seeking directions against the plaintiff, Cup...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Motion to Vacate Arrest of Indian Flag Vessel for Maritime Claim for Necessaries. Claim for necessaries is a maritime claim under admiralty law, and Indian courts have jurisdiction over Indian flag vessels.

9 Jun 2015

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by Amrut Dredging and Shipping Limited, a third party purchaser, seeking to vacate the arrest of the vessel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Vacation of Vessel Arrest in Maritime Claim for Necessaries and Hire. Court holds that under the Admiralty Act, 2017, a demise charterer is not the owner for the purpose of arrest, and a claim for necessaries does not give rise to an action in rem against a vessel owned by a third party.

10 May 2013

The appellant, Sunil B. Naik, filed an appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge dated 17 April 2013 vacating the arrest of the vessel Geow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion for Determination of Priority of Claims Against Sale Proceeds of Arrested Vessel in Admiralty Suit. The court directed that the order of priority of claims against the sale proceeds shall be determined after the expiration of a period specified by the court and that a notice inviting claims be published under Sub-rule 951(3) of the Bombay High Court Rules.

19 Oct 2012

The plaintiff, Sparebanken Sogn og Fjordane, a Norwegian bank, filed an admiralty suit against the vessel m.v. BOS ANGLER and its owner Bos Angler AS,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Vacation of Vessel Arrest in Admiralty Suit for Bunker Supply Claim. The court held that the Single Judge erred in vacating the arrest and directing security without proper findings of mala fides.

27 Apr 2010

The appellant, Chemoil Adani Pvt. Ltd., filed an admiralty suit against the vessel m.v. Hansa Sonderburg and its owners for recovery of dues for suppl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Referral of Admiralty Suit to Arbitration Under Section 45 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Arbitration Agreement Enforceable Despite Admiralty Claim. The court held that the existence of an arbitration agreement between parties mandates referral of the dispute to arbitration, and the admiralty suit cannot proceed in court.

6 Jul 2005

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking referral of an admiralty...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Arrest of Vessel in Admiralty Suit for Bunkers Supply — Holds That Bunkers Are Necessaries and Arrest Valid Under Admiralty Jurisdiction. The court upheld the arrest of M.V. Rainbow Ace for a claim for bunkers supplied as necessaries, affirming the High Court's inherent admiralty jurisdiction.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves an admiralty suit filed by Lufeng Shipping Co. Ltd., a Chinese company, against the vessel M.V. Rainbow Ace, a Panamanian-flag vesse...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)