Search Results for "additional meetings"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "additional meetings"

859 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 859 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Internal Dispute — Interim Injunction Denied for Party Meetings. Court holds that temporary injunction in political party affairs requires strict compliance with CPC principles and balance of convenience.

27 Sep 2022

The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from interim orders in civil suits concerning the internal management of the All India Anna D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Directly Elected Sarpanch Challenging No-Confidence Motion — Motion by Gram Sabha Invalid Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Directly Elected Sarpanch Under Section 30A-1A Cannot Be Removed by Gram Sabha; Only Voters Who Elected Him Can Pass No-Confidence Motion.

12 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Amol Pandurang Godbole, was directly elected as Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Balirampur in the 2017 general election, a post reserved...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Remands Oppression Petition in Share Allotment Dispute Under Sections 397/398 of Companies Act, 1956 — Preference Shareholder's Voting Rights and Validity of Allotments Require Reconsideration. The Court held that the allotments were made in compliance with Section 81(1A) but the High Court failed to properly assess the allegations of oppression, necessitating a fresh hearing by the Company Law Board.

10 May 2019

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court which set aside an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) in a petition under Sections 397 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Disqualification of Sarpanch for Failure to Convene Monthly Meetings — Responsibility Lies with Village Development Officer Under Meeting Rules, Not Sarpanch Under Section 36 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act

12 Mar 2019

The petitioner, Salimbi Mubarak Tamboli, was elected as Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Savargaon (Dere) in 2015, unopposed as the only OBC candidate. The U...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds No-Confidence Motion Against Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch; Meeting Convened Within Two Days Valid Under 1975 Rules. Special meeting for no-confidence motion under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act and the 1975 Rules does not require three clear days' notice as per Rule 4 of Meetings Rules 1959, and meeting held within seven days is sufficient.

2 Jul 2018

The dispute arose from a no-confidence motion passed against the Sarpanch and Up-Sarpanch of Village Panchayat Kawalgaon, Taluka Degloor, District Nan...

High Court

KAHC010008432018_1

28 Feb 2018

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Winding Up Petition Under Companies Act, 1956 – Default in Repayment of Secured Facilities Allegedly Renders Respondent Unable to Pay Debts. Petitioner Bank Seeks Winding Up and Appointment of Provisional Liquidator After Respondent Defaults on Short-Term Loan and Letters of Credit.

14 Feb 2017

The case concerned a company petition for winding up under the Companies Act, 1956, instituted by IDFC Bank Limited, a creditor, against M/s.Ruchi Soy...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Termination of Arbitral Proceedings and Constitute New Arbitral Tribunal Under Sections 9 and 14 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Delay Condoned Due to Sufficient Cause Shown by Legal Heirs of Deceased Partner.

12 Aug 2015

The petitioners, Neeta Lalit Sanghavi and Hemanshu Lalit Sanghavi, are the legal heirs of the deceased partner, Lalitkumar Vanmalidas Sanghavi. They f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion in Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act Case. Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 fails as no-confidence motion was validly passed in special meeting presided by Tahsildar under Section 35(3-B) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958.

29 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Bhaskar s/o Laxmanrao Kadam, was the Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Nivgha (Bazar), Taluka Hadgaon, District Nanded. A special meeting was ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admitted Writ Petition Challenging Cooperative Appellate Court's Order in Redevelopment Dispute. Interim Relief Granted for Possession of Flats in Ready Building Despite Opposition from Some Members.

25 Jun 2010

The writ petition was filed by a cooperative housing society ('Godi Kamgar Griha Sanstha Ltd.') and its developer ('Bharat Infrastructure & Engineerin...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)