Search Results for "Yerwada Central Prison"

210 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 210 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay. Preventive detention order set aside as 7 months and 8 days delay between crimes and detention order was not satisfactorily explained, violating constitutional safeguards.

The petitioner, Kiran Ramjan Machare, challenged a detention order dated 5 September 2023 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Pimpari-Chinchwad, Pun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Lacked Consistency and Corroboration.

The appellant, Satish Mahadeo Kale, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife, Manisha, by setting her on fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough to Convict in Criminal Writ Petition. Furlough is a Right Under Rule 17 of Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959, and Rejection Based on Pendency of Appeal is Unsustainable.

The judgment pertains to two criminal writ petitions filed by Dastgir Gafur Shaha, a convict, and his father Gafur Sandu Shaha, seeking release on fur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Consideration of Representation. Failure to Consider Detenu's Representation Before Confirmation Violates Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Wasim @ Mukri A.Salar, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Confirmation by Advisory Board. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Violated as Grounds of Detention Were Not Properly Considered.

The petitioner, Shrinivas Kishor Sanga, challenged his detention order dated 30/10/2018 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Murder Conviction in Pepsi Refusal Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Stone Attack on Unarmed Vendor Constitutes Murder Under Section 302 IPC as Intention to Cause Death Inferred from Repeated Blows on Vital Parts.

The appellant, Balaji Kishan Nagarwad, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir, for the murder of Tukaram under Section 302 IPC and sent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Evidence of Interested Witness Was Contradictory and Improbable.

The appellant, Kalam Gulab Patel, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karad, for the murder of his cousin Sikandar Ismail Patel under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Four Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Conviction under Sections 302, 326, 324 read with Section 34 IPC confirmed as prosecution proved chain of circumstances leading to the murder of the deceased.

The case involves four appellants who were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of one person and causing injuries to othe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder of Wife and Son Based on Circumstantial and Ocular Evidence — Last Seen Theory and Child Witness Testimony Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC.

The appellant was convicted under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife Rohini and their one-and-a-half-year-old so...