Bombay High Court Upholds Murder Conviction in Pepsi Refusal Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Stone Attack on Unarmed Vendor Constitutes Murder Under Section 302 IPC as Intention to Cause Death Inferred from Repeated Blows on Vital Parts.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 66
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Balaji Kishan Nagarwad, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir, for the murder of Tukaram under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The incident occurred on 6 June 2012 when the deceased, a daily wager selling Pepsi candies, refused to give a free Pepsi to the appellant. The appellant picked up a quarrel and attacked the deceased with a stone, causing fatal head injuries. The deceased was admitted to a primary health center where he succumbed. The FIR was lodged by the deceased's uncle, Dnyaneshwar. The prosecution examined eyewitnesses, including PW-1 and PW-2, who testified to seeing the appellant assault the deceased with a stone. The medical evidence (PW-8) confirmed the cause of death as head injury. The appellant's defense was that he was falsely implicated. The trial court convicted him. On appeal, the High Court examined the evidence and found the eyewitness accounts credible and corroborated by medical evidence. The court held that the appellant's act of hitting the deceased on the head with a stone, a dangerous weapon, indicated an intention to cause death. The appeal was dismissed, and the conviction and sentence were upheld.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Murder - Section 302 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Conviction upheld - Appellant attacked deceased with a stone on his head and other vital parts after deceased refused to give Pepsi for free - Medical evidence confirmed cause of death as head injury - Held that the intention to cause death can be inferred from the nature of the injury and the weapon used (Paras 1-16).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of Tukaram is sustainable on the basis of the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed. Conviction and sentence of life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC upheld.

Law Points

  • Murder
  • Section 302 IPC
  • intention to cause death
  • stone attack
  • vital parts
  • dying declaration
  • circumstantial evidence
  • conviction upheld
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (01) 7

Criminal Appeal No. 474 of 2013

2019-01-30

S.S. Shinde, R.G. Avachat

Mr. R.D. Sanap for appellant, Mr. R.V. Dasalkar for respondent State

Balaji Kishan Nagarwad

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal from the conviction and sentence of life imprisonment.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted for murder of Tukaram by attacking him with a stone after deceased refused to give free Pepsi.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted appellant on 3rd October 2013 in Sessions Case No. 43 of 2012.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 302 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence of eyewitnesses and medical evidence.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the prosecution failed to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt and that the eyewitnesses were not reliable. Respondent argued that the evidence of eyewitnesses and medical evidence clearly established the guilt of the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi

The intention to cause death can be inferred from the nature of the injury, the weapon used (stone), and the vital part of the body (head) targeted. The eyewitness accounts and medical evidence corroborate each other, establishing the guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant asked the deceased to give Pepsi for free. The deceased refused. The appellant, thereupon picked up a quarrel with the deceased. He picked up a stone and literally lynched the deceased therewith. The medical evidence confirmed the cause of death as head injury.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Udgir on 3rd October 2013 in Sessions Case No. 43 of 2012. He appealed to the High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad. The appeal was reserved on 7th January 2019 and pronounced on 30th January 2019.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Murder Conviction in Pepsi Refusal Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Stone Attack on Unarmed Vendor Constitutes Murder Under Section 302 IPC as Intention to Cause Death Inferred from Repeated Blows on Vital Parts.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court "Supreme Court Decides on AERA's Right to Appeal: Can Regulatory Authorities Challenge Their Own Decisions?" "Clarifying the distinction between regulatory and quasi-judicial functions in appeal maintainability."