Search Results for "Workmen’s Compensation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Workmen’s Compensation"

1106 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1106 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Supervisor Held to be Workman Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. The court upheld the Commissioner's finding that the deceased was a loader (manual worker) and thus a 'workman' under the Act, rejecting the insurance company's contention that a supervisor is excluded.

19 Nov 2024

The case involves an appeal filed by the Oriental Insurance Company under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, challenging the award...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeals in Workmen's Compensation Cases — Tractor-Trolley Accident Victims Awarded Compensation. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Absence of Written Contract; Insurance Company Liable to Indemnify Owner Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

7 Jul 2021

The case involves four appeals filed by the ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company against the common judgment and order dated 4/11/2008 passed by th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Claimants' Appeal in Workmen Compensation Case — Deputy Labour Commissioner Has Jurisdiction Over Contested Claims Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923. High Court Erred in Holding Contested Dispute as Coram-non-judice Before Commissioner.

1 Jan 2023

The appellants, being the wife, son, and parents of late Sri Vakil Choudhary, filed a claim petition under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, befor...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Loss of Earning Capacity Cannot Be Assessed at 100% Without Medical Evidence. Commissioner's Award Set Aside for Disregarding Medical Assessment and Schedule Prescribing Loss of Earning Capacity Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

27 Nov 2014

The appellant, National Insurance Company Limited, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, cha...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal, Reduces Compensation in Workmen's Compensation Case. Commissioner's assessment of 100% loss of earning capacity set aside as contrary to medical evidence showing 26% disability under Section 4(1)(c) of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

25 Mar 2015

The appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, against the order dated 19th June ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Insurer's Liability in Workmen's Compensation Case — Accident in Course of Employment as Loader. Employer-Employee Relationship Established; Insurer's Breach of Policy Defence Rejected Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

6 Aug 2015

The case involves an appeal by The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and order dated 22.02.2011 passed by the Commissioner under the Wo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Reduces Compensation to 34% Permanent Disablement. Commissioner erred in awarding 100% compensation for total permanent disablement when medical evidence showed only 34% loss of earning capacity under Section 4(1)(c) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

10 Dec 2021

The appellant, Shri Mahesh Forge, an employer, filed a First Appeal under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, challenging the judgment and order dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Death Not Arising Out of Employment. Deceased lineman died of heart attack while on duty but without any work-related strain; held not compensable under Section 3 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

13 Apr 2023

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a single judgment and award dated 23.11.2001 passed by the Commissioner, Workmen's Compensation Tribu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Insurance Company and Owner in Workmen's Compensation Case. Cleaner's Death in Accident During Employment Held Compensable Under Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

11 Nov 2022

The case involves two appeals under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, filed by the New India Assurance Co. Ltd. (Insurance Company) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Not Liable for Death of Agricultural Labourer Due to Electrocution as Incident Did Not Arise Out of and in the Course of Employment. The court held that the death of a 'Salgadi' (yearly labourer) due to electrocution while cutting grass for personal use, not for the employer's work, does not fall within the purview of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

13 Oct 2017

The case involves an appeal under Section 30 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, filed by Chandrakant Toshniwal, the owner of agricultural land, ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)