Search Results for "Workmen's compensation"

623 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 623 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Workmen's Compensation Case — Employer Failed to Disprove Employment Relationship and Negligence. Commissioner's award of compensation, penalty, interest, medical expenses, and costs under Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 upheld.

The present appeal was filed by the Chief Officer, Bhanvad Municipality, under Section 30 of the Employees' Compensation Act, 1923, challenging the ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employees' Application to File Letters Patent Appeal Against Single Judge Order Rejecting Recall of Settlement. Settlement between Company and Union Held Binding on Workmen Despite Non-Signatory Status.

The case involves two civil applications filed by individual employees of M/s Jaysynth Anthraquinone Ltd. and M/s Jaysynth Dyechem Ltd. seeking leave ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order for Reinstatement with Full Back Wages. Termination of Workmen Held to Be Colourable Exercise of Employer's Rights and Victimization Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Anglo French Drugs & Industries Ltd., challenged an order of the Industrial Court dated 11th April 2002, which allowed a revision appl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Industrial Dispute Over Bonus Payment — No Error Apparent on Record. Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is limited to errors apparent on face of record; re-argument on merits not permitted.

The judgment concerns a batch of review petitions filed against a common judgment dated 18th December 2013 passed by the Bombay High Court in several ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Writ Petitions Against Labour Court Orders in Recovery Proceedings Under Section 33C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Held That Assignee Bank Steps Into Shoes of Transferor and Is Liable for Pre-Transfer Claims of Workmen.

The petitioners, the Authorized Officer and Chairman & Managing Director of IDBI Bank (Stressed Assets Stabilization Fund), filed four writ petitions ...