Search Results for "Withdrawal from acquisition"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA Appeal in Land Acquisition Withdrawal Case — State Government's Endorsements Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Quashed. Land Vests in State Once Possession Taken and Compensation Paid; Government Cannot Withdraw from Acquisition Under Section 48.

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) and the Additional Land Acquisition Officer against an order of a l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Government's Withdrawal from Acquisition Set Aside Due to Possession and Award. Possession Taken and Award Passed Preclude Withdrawal Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had set aside the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows U.P. Housing Authority's Appeal Against Cancellation of Land Release Notification. Fraud by Land Owners in Obtaining Release Justifies Cancellation Without Fresh Acquisition Under Section 21 of General Clauses Act, 1897.

The Supreme Court considered appeals by U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad against a High Court order that set aside a notification cancelling the release ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRDC's Petition Challenging Withdrawal from Land Acquisition Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Subsequent Purchaser Allowed to Seek Return of Land as Acquisition Was Not Completed Within Stipulated Time.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation Ltd. (MSRDC), challenged the judgment and order dated 6th December 2005 passed by the L...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs State to Issue Notification Giving Effect to Withdrawal of Land Acquisition Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Minister's Order Deleting Land from Acquisition Must Be Implemented by Issuing Appropriate Notification.

The petitioner, Vishnudev Coop. Hsg. Society, a registered cooperative society, was the owner of land admeasuring 10H 33R forming part of Survey No.21...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Releasing Land from Acquisition in Pimpri Chinchwad Development Case. Minister Exceeded Powers Under Section 48(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 by Not Recording Reasons and Ignoring Public Interest.

The case involves two writ petitions filed by the Pimpri Chinchwad New Town Development Authority challenging an order dated 21st September 2004 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Payment of Compensation for Land Acquired Without Following Procedure Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Possession Taken in 2003 Without Formal Acquisition; Court Orders Completion of Proceedings and Compensation with Interest.

The petitioner, Balbhim Shamrao Ghumare, owned agricultural lands in village Pargaon Ghumara, Taluka Patoda, District Beed. Part of his land was requi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Minister's Order Deleting Land from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Minister Exceeded Powers by Exercising Authority After Possession Was Taken and Title Vested in State.

The petitioner, Pimpri Chinchwad New Town Development Authority, established under the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 for developing a n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Withdrawal from Land Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Government's Discretion to Withdraw Upheld After Notification Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Resettlement of Project Displaced Persons Act, 1976 Lapsed.

The petitioners, Sharad Jijaba Kakade and Sandip Jijaba Kakade, were members of a joint Hindu family that owned ancestral land recorded in the name of...