Search Results for "Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Rules"

212 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 212 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Workman's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Order Dismissing Complaint for Non-Implementation of Award. Delay of 4½ years in filing complaint under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 held fatal as no sufficient cause shown.

11 Dec 2013

The petitioner, Kashinath Parvati Labade, was a workman employed with the Department of Social Forestry, Maharashtra. He was allegedly illegally termi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Reinstatement of Conductor in UPSRTC Case — Domestic Inquiry Defect Cured by Employer Evidence, But Tribunal's Appreciation of Evidence Not Perverse. The Court held that the Tribunal's finding that the inspector was not proved to have inspected the bus was a plausible appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

8 Dec 2021

The appeal arose from an order of the Allahabad High Court which upheld the Industrial Tribunal's decision reinstating a conductor of the Uttar Prades...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with 50% Back Wages for Security Inspectors. Employer's Failure to Lead Evidence and Participate in Conciliation Justified Adverse Inference Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

5 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Group Four Security Services India Pvt. Ltd., a security agency, challenged the judgment and award dated 27/08/2018 passed by the Labo...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Bank's Challenge to Reinstatement and Regularisation of Daily-Wage Workers in Industrial Disputes Act Case — Upholds Tribunal's Finding of Illegal Termination. CGIT Award Directing Reinstatement with 30% Backwages and Regularisation Under Section 25F Not Interfered as Workers Completed 240 Days of Service and Termination Was in Violation of Statutory Provisions.

12 Dec 2025

The writ petition challenged an award of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-II, Mumbai, which had directed reinstatement and regularisation of...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Whether Remedy Under Industrial Disputes Act Is Available to Non-Teaching Staff of Private School in View of Exclusive Remedy Under MEPS Act. Labour Court Had Dismissed References as Not Maintainable Citing Adarsh Shikshan Sanstha and St. Ulai High School Decisions.

9 Dec 2016

Two writ petitions were filed by non-teaching staff of a private school challenging Labour Court awards that dismissed their references under the Indu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses/Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Minimum Wages Notification – Not mentioned. Petitioners, including industry associations and companies, challenged notification dated 27.12.2016 issued by the Labour Department on grounds of unconstitutionality and violation of Minimum Wages Act, 1948.

29 Mar 2019

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Air India Disinvestment and Transfer of Employees. Transfer of undertaking under Section 25FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require consent of workmen and continuity of service is protected.

13 Mar 2023

The petitioners, three trade unions representing employees of Air India and its subsidiaries, filed writ petitions challenging the disinvestment of Ai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Contract Labourer Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Petitioner's Retrenchment Held Illegal as He Was a 'Workman' Under Section 2(s) and Termination Was Effected Without Notice or Compensation.

6 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Vijay Appaso Dhavale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging his termination from employment with the Maharash...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Workman in Industrial Dispute — Delay in Raising Dispute Not Fatal When Workman Served Continuously for 240 Days and Termination Was Oral Without Notice. The court held that oral termination without notice or wages in lieu of notice violates Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and delay of 9 years does not bar the claim.

16 Jun 2006

The case involves an appeal by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL) against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, which set asi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Award Denying Subsistence Allowance for Failure to Mark Attendance During Suspension. Suspended Employee Not Required to Attend Factory Daily for Subsistence Allowance Under Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946.

3 Jan 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Hindustan Level Employees Union, challenged an Award dated 13.08.2014 which rejected a Reference concerning denial of subsistence...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)