Search Results for "Unjust enrichment"

33 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 33 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Recovery of Excess Payments from In-Service Nursing Trainees Under Restitution Principle. Recovery Permitted as Payments Were Made Pursuant to Court Order Later Set Aside, Distinguishing Mistaken Payment Guidelines Under Rafiq Masih Case for Class III and IV Employees.

The dispute originated from in-service employees of the Rajasthan Medical & Health Subordinate Service, working as ANMs, Lab Technicians, and similar ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Telecom Company's Claim for Refund of Entry Fee After 2G Licences Quashed Due to Illegal Government Policy. Restitution Under Section 65 of Indian Contract Act, 1872 Denied as Quashing Did Not Render Contracts Void, and Set-Off Policy Upheld Under Article 14 of Constitution.

The dispute involved a telecom company seeking a refund of an Entry Fee of Rs 1454.94 crores paid for 2G licences across twenty-one service areas, aft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Judgment in SARFAESI Act Case Due to Non-Compliance and Limitation. Bank's Auction Sale Upheld as Borrower's Challenge Was Time-Barred and Requests Did Not Trigger Statutory Obligations Under Section 13(3A) of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

The dispute arose from proceedings under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SAR...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Contractual Dispute Over Lease Agreement Execution. High Court's Decision to Relegate Parties to Appropriate Forum Upheld Due to Disputed Questions of Fact Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The dispute arose from a lease agreement for Hotel Nilachal Ashok in Puri, where the State of Odisha had granted a 99-year lease to Utkal Ashok Hotel ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Industrial Dispute Over Compulsory Retirement Without Approval. Termination Declared Void Under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Due to Failure to Obtain Prior Approval, Leading to Reinstatement with Back Wages.

The dispute arose from the compulsory retirement of the respondent, a Museum Assistant, by the appellant, National Gandhi Museum, in 2004 following mi...