Search Results for "Trade Mark Rectification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Trade Mark Rectification"

97 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 97 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Interim Application in Trademark Infringement Suit Concerning M-SEAL and R-SEAL Marks. Plaintiff Alleges Deceptive Similarity and Passing Off, Citing Prior Registrations and Well-Known Status.

11 Nov 2022

The plaintiff, Pidilite Industries Limited, a world-renowned company dealing in sealants and adhesives, filed an interim application in a commercial i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case: 'ROFOL' vs 'PROFOL'. Prior Registration of 'ROFOL' by Plaintiff in 1992 Entitles Injunction Against Defendant's Deceptively Similar Mark 'PROFOL' Under Section 29 of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

31 Mar 2012

The plaintiff, M/s. Neon Laboratories Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, M/s. Medical Technologies Ltd. an...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Registration of 'DROPOVIT' Trade Mark in Vitamin Preparation Dispute; Holds No Deceptive Similarity with 'PROTOVIT'. Terminal Syllable 'VIT' Held Common to Trade and Descriptive, and Pharmaceutical Products Sold on Prescription Reduce Likelihood of Confusion under Sections 12(1) and 9(1) of Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958.

8 Sep 1969

The dispute involved a trade mark rectification proceeding under the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958, between F. Hoffmann-La Roche & Co. Ltd., a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit — Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Swisskem Healthcare & Anr. — 'PANDERM' and 'POLYDERM+' Held Deceptively Similar. The Court held that the marks are structurally and phonetically similar, and the Defendant's use is likely to cause confusion, especially in medicinal products where a high degree of care is expected.

2 Jul 2019

The Plaintiff, Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, Swisskem Healthcare and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Eris Lifesciences in Trademark Infringement Case. Phonetic Similarity Between 'NEBISTAR' and 'NEBISTOL' Leads to Restraint Order Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

23 Dec 2015

The Plaintiff, Lupin Limited, filed a suit alleging that the Defendants, Eris Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd. and others, were infringing its registered tradem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Trademark Infringement in Favor of Plaintiff. Passing Off Claim Deferred Due to Pending Rectification Proceedings Under Section 124 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

11 Apr 2012

The plaintiffs, Hem Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and three individuals (erstwhile partners of a firm), filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal in Trade Mark Infringement Case Where Corporate Name Used for Dissimilar Goods. Court Examines Whether Section 29(4) or 29(5) of Trade Marks Act, 1999 Applies When Registered Mark Is Part of Tradename for Unrelated Pharmaceuticals.

13 Jul 2010

The appeal arose from a suit filed by Raymond Limited (plaintiff) against Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. (defendant) for trade mark infringement. T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Trademark Infringement and Passing Off in 'MARINE' Mark Dispute. Plaintiff's registered trademarks for adhesives and sealants protected against defendant's use of identical mark for similar goods.

13 Jan 2014

The plaintiff, Pidilite Industries Limited, filed a suit against Jubilant Agri & Consumer Products Limited alleging infringement of its registered tra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Reject Plaint in Trade Mark Infringement Suit Where Defendant's Mark is Registered. Court Holds That Registration of Defendant's Mark Does Not Bar Suit for Infringement Under Sections 29 and 30 of Trade Marks Act, 1999, and Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

13 Jan 2012

The dispute arose from a suit for infringement and passing off filed by the plaintiff, M/s. Siyaram Silk Mills Limited, against the defendants, M/s. S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Appeal Against Denial of Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Passing Off Dispute, Holding No Prima Facie Case or Balance of Convenience. Phonetic Similarity of 'CHYMTRAL FORTE' to 'CHYMORAL FORTE' Insufficient for Interim Relief Where Drugs are Schedule H Prescription Medicines and Public Interest Favors Affordable Pricing.

17 Nov 2017

The dispute arose from Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited's claim that Wockhardt Limited and East African (India) Remedies Pvt. Ltd. were passing off the...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)