Search Results for "Tractor"

271 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 271 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Thresher Attached to Tractor Not a Motor Vehicle Accident Under Section 163A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Agricultural Labourer's Hand Amputated in Thresher Does Not Arise Out of Use of Motor Vehicle.

The appellant, Krishnaji @ Kisanji Ramaji Tadas, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 337 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Rash or Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The applicant, Tatyarao s/o Ganpatrao Tambe, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class (Court No.8), Aurangabad in S.C.C. No.3625 of 2001 f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt the role of each accused in the fatal assault.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Sudhakar Pandurang Jagtap and others under Sections 302, 323, 504 read with 34 IPC for the murde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Tractor Accident Case — Negligence of Driver Established, Compensation Enhanced. Deceased was unauthorized passenger in goods vehicle; insurer not liable but owner liable to pay enhanced compensation under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased Sarasu died after being hit by a tractor while alighting. The claimants, her husband, m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claims — Apportionment of Future Prospects and Multiplier Applied Correctly. The court held that the Tribunal erred in not considering future prospects and applied a higher multiplier for loss of dependency.

The appeals arise out of a motor vehicle accident that occurred on 22.12.2012 involving a lorry bearing registration No.KA-07/AA-1234. The claimants, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Circumstantial Evidence Case Due to Unreliable Last Seen Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302/364/392/394/201 IPC set aside as chain of circumstances was incomplete.

The appellant, Dinesh Kumar, along with co-accused Mange Ram, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jagadhri, Haryana, for offences under Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Police Constable Dismissal Case — Reinstates Dismissal Despite Criminal Acquittal. Standard of Proof in Disciplinary Proceedings is Preponderance of Probabilities, Not Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Division Bench of the Rajasthan High Court which set aside the dismissal of the respondent, a police constabl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Classification of Bearings as General Bearings Under Entry C-II-146 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959. The court held that bearings not exclusively used in automobiles or tractors are not auto or tractor parts, applying common parlance test.

The case involves three Sales Tax References filed by M/s Kirloskar Oil Engines Ltd. against the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State, under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Partly Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Enhances Compensation to Rs. 28,80,000 with Modified Contributory Negligence and Higher Interest Under MV Act

The appellants, legal heirs of deceased P. Ramesh, filed an appeal under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (MV Act) against the Tribunal's aw...