Search Results for "Tiller's day"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Tiller's day"

80 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 80 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Maharashtra Tenancy Act Case — Right to Purchase Not Lost Due to Lack of Knowledge of Landlord's Death. The court held that the limitation period under Section 32-F of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 runs from the date the tenant gains knowledge of the cessation of the landlord's disability, not from the date of cessation itself.

18 Sep 2019

The case involves a dispute under the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, concerning the right of tenants to purchase agricultural l...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Rules on Writ Petitions Challenging MRT Order on Tenancy Claim Under Maharashtra Tenancy Act. The decision addresses the validity of the tenancy declaration under Section 70(b) and Section 32G of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

23 Apr 2025

The petitioners, who claimed to be Watandars, filed writ petitions in the High Court of Bombay challenging a common order passed by the Maharashtra Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Petition Challenging Tenant's Purchase Rights Under Bombay Tenancy Act — Landlord's Failure to Cultivate Land Within One Year of Purchase Triggers Tenant's Right to Purchase Under Section 84 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

21 Jun 2006

The case involves a dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, regarding agricultural land in Survey No. 341, admeasuring 15 a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Under Article 227 Challenging MRT's Composite Order — Holds Simultaneous Condonation of Delay and Decision on Merits Impermissible. The MRT's order condoning delay and allowing revision in a tenancy restoration case was set aside for procedural irregularity and the matter remitted for fresh consideration.

23 Aug 2019

The writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenged an order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) which had allowed a rev...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Civil Court Decree in Tenancy Land Sale Dispute — Compromise Decree and Sale Deed Upheld as Valid. Transfer of Property Act Sections 41 and 51 Protect Bona Fide Purchaser from Ostensible Owner, and Civil Court Lacks Jurisdiction Under Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Sections 85 and 63.

6 Jul 2006

The case involves a dispute over agricultural land in Baramati. One Ramchandra Ganpat Daskul owned land in Survey No.91-A (14 acres 14 gunthas) and Su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition Challenging Land Transfer Without Previous Sanction Under Section 43 of Bombay Tenancy Act. Post-transfer sanction cannot regularize invalid transfer; MRT order set aside.

5 Feb 2015

The petitioner, Smt. Saraswati Shamrao Dhere, was a tenant of half portion of agricultural land in Shiroli, Kolhapur. Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 were ten...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Issue Certificate of Purchase Under Bombay Tenancy Act. The Court held that the tenant's right to purchase land under Section 32G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 is not barred by limitation despite delay in issuance of certificate, and the Mamlatdar's order was perverse.

4 May 2011

The petitioner, Mesaji S/o Laxman Ubare, was a tenant of agricultural land owned by the respondents. He claimed to have become a deemed purchaser of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Agreement to Sell Despite Non-Payment of Balance Consideration. Court Holds That Time Was Not of Essence in Absence of Express Stipulation and That Possession Delivered Under Agreement Constitutes Part Performance.

16 Dec 2005

The dispute arose out of an agreement to sell dated 1st June 1978 executed by the original defendant No.2 (since deceased, represented by appellants) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Purchasers Challenging Eviction Order in Tenancy Dispute — Purchasers Lack Locus Standi to Challenge Order Passed Against Tenant Before Their Purchase. The court held that the petitioners, who purchased the suit land after the eviction order under Section 14 read with Section 25(2) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, cannot challenge that order as they were not parties to the proceedings.

19 Jan 2005

The judgment arises from a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India filed by three petitioners, who are purchasers of agricultural...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition in Tenancy Dispute — MRT Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Restoration of Possession Cannot Be Ordered Without Hearing the Landlord Under Section 84 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

23 Aug 2019

The petitioners, Kacharu B. Ambekar and others, are the successors-in-interest of the original landlord of agricultural lands bearing Gat No.333 (47 A...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)