Search Results for "Tariff Classification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Tariff Classification"

97 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 97 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Classification of Plant Growth Promoters as Excisable Goods Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Products Containing NPK as Essential Constituent Classified as 'Other Fertilizers' Under Note 6 Chapter 3105, Attracting 1% Duty.

29 Aug 2018

The petitioners, Dharti Agro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and its director, challenged an order dated 8 March 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal, Classifies Car Matting as Carpet Under Chapter 57 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. HSN Explanatory Notes and Specific Description Principle Applied to Hold That Car Matting Is More Specifically Described as Carpet Than as Motor Vehicle Accessory.

1 May 2020

The case involved two appeals by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-III against a common decision of the Customs Excise & Service Tax Appellate...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Electricity Company's Petition Challenging CGRF Order Directing Refund of Differential Tariff. Reclassification of Petrol Pump from Industrial to Commercial Tariff Upheld as Per Commercial Circular No.175 and MERC Tariff Order; CGRF Exceeded Jurisdiction by Not Considering Limitation Under Section 56(2) of Electricity Act, 2003.

27 Apr 2026

The petitioner, the Executive Engineer and Nodal Officer of Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., challenged the order dated 29.06....

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Commissioner of Customs' Appeal Against Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Anti-Dumping Duty Demand. Tribunal Correctly Found Show Cause Notices Lacked Basis for Reclassification and Anti-Dumping Notification Did Not Cover Goods Under Declared Tariff Heading CTH 40021100 Under Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

21 Sep 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs, Pune against a judgment of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against HERC Amendment Denying Tariff Adjustment to Biomass Power Plant Commissioned in FY 2013-14. The Court held that classification of projects based on financial year of commissioning within the same control period was arbitrary and discriminatory under the HERC Regulations.

2 Jul 2019

The case involves an appeal by M/S Star Wire (India) Vidyut Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. against the Haryana Electricity Regulatory Commission (HERC) regarding th...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Electricity Ombudsman's Order Allowing Refund of Excess Tariff Charged to Industrial Consumer. Limitation Period Under MERC Regulations Not Applicable to Continuing Wrong of Wrongful Billing at Commercial Tariff Instead of Industrial Tariff.

18 Jul 2017

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), challenged the order dated 22/01/2016 passed by the Electricity O...

High Court

High Court Quashes CGRF Order Directing Revision of Energy Bills for HT Consumer on Express Feeder. Interpretation of 'Dedicated Distribution Facilities' under MERC Supply Code Regulations 2005 determines consumer classification.

21 Jun 2011

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice and Order in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Stators and Rotors of Hermetic Motors Classifiable as Parts of Electric Motors, Not Compressors. Approved Classification Lists Cannot Be Reopened Without Fresh Material Under Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944.

23 Jan 2017

The petitioner, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, challenged a show cause notice dat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Classification Dispute — Interest Under Section 11AA Not Payable When Goods Cleared Under Provisional Assessment. Court holds that interest under Section 11AA of the Central Excise Act, 1944 is not attracted when goods are cleared pending finalisation of classification list, as the assessment is provisional.

20 Mar 2012

The appellant-assessee, originally known as Morris Electronics Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of soft ferrite components. It filed a classificat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Importer in Customs Classification and Valuation Dispute — Head End Equipment Classified Under CTH 8543 8999 and Software/Service Charges Included in Assessable Value. The court upheld the Tribunal's finding that the imported goods constituted a complete functional unit and that the appellant's mis-declaration of classification and value justified penalties under Sections 112(a) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962.

27 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Indusind Media & Communications Ltd. against the order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)