Search Results for "Tangible Material"

282 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 282 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Reopening of Assessment Beyond Four Years Held Illegal Without Fresh Tangible Material. Reassessment Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Quashed Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and Change of Opinion

The Bombay High Court quashed the notice dated 27 March 2021 under Section 148 and the assessment order dated 29 March 2022, holding that: The reopen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Exemption Under Section 10(38) of Income Tax Act, 1961 is Invalid.

The Petitioner, General Insurance Corporation of India, a public sector general insurance company, filed a return of income for Assessment Year 2006-0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Requiring 25% Pre-deposit for Waiver of Appeal Under SARFAESI Act. Legal Heirs of Guarantor Must Deposit 25% of Section 13(2) Notice Amount as Condition for Hearing Appeal on Merits.

The petitioners, Smt. Julie Amitabh Parekh and others, who are the legal heirs of the deceased guarantor Amitabh Arun Parekh, filed a writ petition ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, Zuari Foods and Farms Pvt. Ltd., filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2011-12 declaring nil income after claiming exemption ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Assessment Reopened Beyond Four Years Based on Same Facts Already Considered During Original Assessment Under Section 143(3) — Held That Change of Opinion Does Not Justify Reopening.

The petitioner, Sanand Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging a notice dated 11 January 2011 is...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(ia) is Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. NDT Systems, a partnership firm engaged in non-destructive testing business, filed its return of income for assessment year 2007-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income-tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Based on Change of Opinion on Commission Payment to Directors Held Invalid as All Issues Were Examined During Original Assessment.

The Petitioner, M/s. Dalal & Broacha Stock Broking Pvt. Ltd., a stock broking company, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2008-09 declarin...